POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : Best Platform ? : Re: Best Platform ? Server Time
13 Aug 2024 23:23:34 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Best Platform ?  
From: Thomas Willhalm
Date: 28 Jul 1998 03:24:15
Message: <qqmlnpemr1r.fsf@goldach.informatik.uni-konstanz.de>
Nite_Hawk <nel### [at] mailminnehahapvtk12mnus> writes:
[...]
>         If you simply want rendering speed, your best bet is most likely
> to go with K6-233/66s in cheap older socket7 mbs.  Then you can use
> cheap EDO ram, and (this is what I would do) build an enclosure for
> maybe 10-20 Mbs, and feed them all power off one central source.  While
> the K6 isn't  a terribly fast cpu for floating point, the
> price/proformance ratio is pretty good, on www.pricewatch.com I believe
> you could find the chip selling for around $90.  Network cards are also
> selling pretty cheap if you look in the right places, I've picked up
> used ElinkIIIs for about $3.  With all this, you could setup a cluster
> of linux machines, and run pvmpov.  The only problem with this setup is
> that each machine needs it's own amount of ram, and each machine has to
> parse the file, which can get redundant.  This kind of setup works best
> for Scenes with low parse time, higher render times, and smaller amounts
> of memory.  So basically scenes that don't have too much geometry, but
> are being rendered at very high resolutions, and have fpu intensive
> options enabled. (focal blur/Radiosity). 
[...]

Just one remark to your detailed description: Currently radiosity isn't
working with pvmpov.

Thomas

-- 
Tho### [at] uni-konstanzde
http://www.informatik.uni-konstanz.de/~willhalm/
Tschieses lavs ju
An den BND: Eisbombe Fremdenfuehrer Siegfried Heilsarmee


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.