|
 |
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:27:22 -0600, "GreyBeard" <r.b### [at] sbcglobal net>
wrote:
>
>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:bb0q40leif2781gqsib3mn0ltgm10a7jrg@4ax.com...
>>
>> Pay attention to what I was actually saying. It's the fault of people
>> if they cannot be bothered to determine wherher or not they should
>> support a format. Dismissing it at first hand without thinking about
>> it is their fault.
>>
>I have. What you have been trying to get across is something like "I am
>right, the rest of the world is wrong".
The World? You think this is the World? Dear me. Get out more.
>Like all the others that believe as
>you do, you have about a snowballs chance in a blast furnace of being right
>on any subject.
Well duh. I wasn't even entirely right on JPEG2000. The 16-bit aspect
seems to have been proved to be a non-starter.
>You will never have anything to post that would be worth
>putting experimental software in an already unstable system. (Windoze 98,
>unstable since '98 and worse with the upgrades.)
A sweeping generalisation. Just hope for your sake that you've not
replied to some of my earlier works in the images group praising them.
Boy, that would sure make that last comment of yours look wrongheaded.
And don't assume I always post under the same name either.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
