 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trf de> wrote in
news:3f81bd53@news.povray.org:
> In article <Xns### [at] 204213191226> , Tom Galvin
> <tom### [at] imporg> wrote:
>
>> You said "But you can call the official Windows version via the
>> command- line just fine." Which I understood.
>>
>
> You are confusing the statements from two different people here...
>
You are correct, I copied from the wrong spot. ABX said "You can call GUI
version from command line".
My apologies again.
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>>#define MAX_QUEUE 512
>>Yes, but why is this limit needed?
>
> To make development simpler and memory requirements less agressive ?
Perhaps it allocates 512 entries at once :>
> As long as it is customizable, it is not limit but kind of advanced setting
> (available only for those with compilers :-) ).
Yes, very advanced - compiling POV-Ray GUI with "your favorite"
MS Windows compiler is not simple I'm afraid...
> Analogically you are free to
> ask Microsoft why "Windows limits selecting multiple files in the "Open"
> system dialog" as you stated.
Yes, I'm asking that :-)
But I understand that the open window is not supposed to
pass 300+ file names, while the queue should allow for
large number of files...
Anyway, as there IS a command-line, I will use GUI only
for single or small numbers of files.
Have a nice day!
Maciej
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:13:20 +0200, Maciej <wet### [at] pocztaonetpl> wrote:
> > > >#define MAX_QUEUE 512
> > >Yes, but why is this limit needed?
> > To make development simpler and memory requirements less agressive ?
>
> Perhaps it allocates 512 entries at once :>
I meant that controlling statically allocated and not resizeable arrays is far
simpler when there are many more important changes to be done during
development. Making it resizable would be rarely used (iirc you are the first
person who noticed such problem). I suppose every development has compromises
between wishes, needs and free time.
> > As long as it is customizable, it is not limit but kind of advanced setting
> > (available only for those with compilers :-) ).
>
> Yes, very advanced - compiling POV-Ray GUI with "your favorite"
> MS Windows compiler is not simple I'm afraid...
But possible. And anybody who will ask how to do this with available free
compilers for win32 will receive answer from me. I managed to compile it with
probably all freely availble win32 compilers.
> Anyway, as there IS a command-line, I will use GUI only
> for single or small numbers of files.
You are probably confusing official and unofficial nature of those products
here. AFAIK official GUI development had support from Intel. This can be
important difference for longer renderings since Intel compiler produces
faster code than MinGW.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
