 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> If you don't understand how POV-Rays radiosity works, just shut up,
please.
>
> Thorsten
LOL!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:18:18 -0700, "khaver" <kha### [at] netzero net>
wrote:
>So what you all are saying is, if you have a radiosity scene where you only
>render a small portion of the full camera's view, that "tile" will not look
>the same as that same area on the fully rendered picture? This does not
>seem to be right. Each process started by SMPOV is simply rendering a part
>of the whole camera's view, so each process would be calculating the
>radiosity in the exact same way.
>
>khaver
>
<tippy_toe> pssst ... <whisper> hi khaver ... check out
http://www.povray.org/documentation/view/309/ section 9.1.3.2
</whisper> </tippy_toe>
Cheers,
Scott
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:09:41 +0200, "Theo Gottwald *"
<The### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> I want to see that in real. Can you please sent me a ".pov"-File which I can
> render in tiles to see the problems ?
1. take any radiosity scene from standard distro
2. render it with jitter and aa off
3. render subregion with jitter and aa off
4. compare each pixel of results
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> If you don't understand how POV-Rays radiosity works, just shut up, please.
Why be so rude ? If that's the 123125th time someone asks the same
thing, there is probably someone else willing to give the 123125th
answer, so you don't have to "waste your time"...
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thorsten Froehlich
Subject: Re: So please WHERE is that file ?
Date: 17 Aug 2002 05:12:31
Message: <3d5e137f@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3D5### [at] skynetbe> , Fabien Mosen
<fab### [at] skynetbe> wrote:
>> If you don't understand how POV-Rays radiosity works, just shut up, please.
>
> Why be so rude ? If that's the 123125th time someone asks the same
> thing, there is probably someone else willing to give the 123125th
> answer, so you don't have to "waste your time"...
Well, if the same question has been answered in previous posts a few hours
ago multiple times already and then someone starts it all over again without
reading the previous messages or understanding the topic I think one should
tell them the truth and not continue the "play nice, think he is an idiot"
game.
Just my opinion, of course.
Thorsten
____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde
Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
