|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> Apache <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>>> This way I can run POV-Ray using a simple telnet client. Then I'll
>>> just need a very narrow bandwidth internet connection to run POV-Ray
>>> on a remote render farm or something!
>>
>> Wouldn't Linux (or any other Unix) be better for this purpose
>> anyways? (With a proper Unix you can even build a cluster from all
>> your computers so that they are transparently connected so that they
>> look like one computer with many processors.)
>
> how exactly would that help anyone running povray....
>
The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than using
one single machine.
I saw a beast like this running, and it was amazing. The cluster was just
for demo, so it was made of cheap machines, and there were just 3 of them -
but its the difference that matters, right?
To render an image:
With just the master -> 70 seg (using both processors)
With the master (both processors) and the two slaves -> 21 sec
Hardware:
Master: Dual Pentium III 550
384 MB
Slave: Single Pentium III 650 EB
256 MB
Software: PovRay
Image: SkyVase.pov
SO: RedHat Linux 7.1 and Conectiva Linux 7.0
The machines were connected by fast ethernet, and a switch.
[]s
--
Lembre-se: Nco alimente o Troll.
Grato, a Administragco.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marcelo Rodrigues <sem### [at] obrigadocom> wrote:
>>>> This way I can run POV-Ray using a simple telnet client. Then I'll
>>>> just need a very narrow bandwidth internet connection to run POV-
>>>> Ray on a remote render farm or something!
>>>
>>> Wouldn't Linux (or any other Unix) be better for this purpose
>>> anyways? (With a proper Unix you can even build a cluster from all
>>> your computers so that they are transparently connected so that they
>>> look like one computer with many processors.)
>>
>> how exactly would that help anyone running povray....
>>
>
> The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than
> using one single machine.
not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 20/06/2002
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> And how it share radiosity file when two instances render the same
>> scene on different processors ?
>
> Whatever the solution is, it's no different whether you are using
> a clustering OS or not. The clustering OS just makes it easier to
> share common data.
not that its hard to share common data with a non clustering OS
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 20/06/2002
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
> not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
Why not? Run several instances.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> So start two instances on cluster to render radiosity animation:
> First instance for frames 1-50
> Second instance for frames 51-100
> How many radiosity files will be created ?
> I have no access to such cluster. I'm really interested in results.
1. When you are crossposting, please set a F'up2.
2. The subject has nothing to do with the contents, so it should be changed.
3. I don't think this is a platform specific thing, so it's OT in both
groups. F'up2 povray.general.
--
Felix Wiemann
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
>>
>> The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than
>> using one single machine.
>
> not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
>
>
Well, here's the link. The site is brazilian so its in portuguese, but the
screenshots of povray are all in english. Hope it helps.
[]s
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Well, here's the link.
*where* is that link?
--
Apache
POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
ICQ: 146690431
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Apache wrote:
>>Well, here's the link.
> *where* is that link?
>
> --
> Apache
> POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
> Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
> ICQ: 146690431
Sorry, my bad. (Ooops!)
Here is the link:
http://www.underlinux.com.br/modules.php?name=Sections&sop=viewarticle&artid=100
[]s
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
thanks! :-)
--
Apache
POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
ICQ: 146690431
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |