 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26 Jun 2002 14:42:21 -0400, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <raf### [at] raf256 com> wrote:
> I would be _very_ greatfull for link to full DJGPP-compilnt pov sources (or
> for emailing it to raf### [at] raf256com, quote is 40 mb)
You probably noticed 3.5 sources are not released yet. Unix generic sources
for 3.1g are almost ready for djgpp. Have you any problem with it? Perhaps
some help You can find via http://news.povray.org/search/?s=djgpp
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> Apache <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>>> This way I can run POV-Ray using a simple telnet client. Then I'll
>>> just need a very narrow bandwidth internet connection to run POV-Ray
>>> on a remote render farm or something!
>>
>> Wouldn't Linux (or any other Unix) be better for this purpose
>> anyways? (With a proper Unix you can even build a cluster from all
>> your computers so that they are transparently connected so that they
>> look like one computer with many processors.)
>
> how exactly would that help anyone running povray....
>
The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than using
one single machine.
I saw a beast like this running, and it was amazing. The cluster was just
for demo, so it was made of cheap machines, and there were just 3 of them -
but its the difference that matters, right?
To render an image:
With just the master -> 70 seg (using both processors)
With the master (both processors) and the two slaves -> 21 sec
Hardware:
Master: Dual Pentium III 550
384 MB
Slave: Single Pentium III 650 EB
256 MB
Software: PovRay
Image: SkyVase.pov
SO: RedHat Linux 7.1 and Conectiva Linux 7.0
The machines were connected by fast ethernet, and a switch.
[]s
--
Lembre-se: Nco alimente o Troll.
Grato, a Administragco.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marcelo Rodrigues <sem### [at] obrigadocom> wrote:
>>>> This way I can run POV-Ray using a simple telnet client. Then I'll
>>>> just need a very narrow bandwidth internet connection to run POV-
>>>> Ray on a remote render farm or something!
>>>
>>> Wouldn't Linux (or any other Unix) be better for this purpose
>>> anyways? (With a proper Unix you can even build a cluster from all
>>> your computers so that they are transparently connected so that they
>>> look like one computer with many processors.)
>>
>> how exactly would that help anyone running povray....
>>
>
> The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than
> using one single machine.
not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 20/06/2002
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> And how it share radiosity file when two instances render the same
>> scene on different processors ?
>
> Whatever the solution is, it's no different whether you are using
> a clustering OS or not. The clustering OS just makes it easier to
> share common data.
not that its hard to share common data with a non clustering OS
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 20/06/2002
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
> not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
Why not? Run several instances.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> So start two instances on cluster to render radiosity animation:
> First instance for frames 1-50
> Second instance for frames 51-100
> How many radiosity files will be created ?
> I have no access to such cluster. I'm really interested in results.
1. When you are crossposting, please set a F'up2.
2. The subject has nothing to do with the contents, so it should be changed.
3. I don't think this is a platform specific thing, so it's OT in both
groups. F'up2 povray.general.
--
Felix Wiemann
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
>>
>> The workload would be shared among the nodes, making much faster than
>> using one single machine.
>
> not applicapable to current version / features of povray.
>
>
Well, here's the link. The site is brazilian so its in portuguese, but the
screenshots of povray are all in english. Hope it helps.
[]s
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Well, here's the link.
*where* is that link?
--
Apache
POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
ICQ: 146690431
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Apache wrote:
>>Well, here's the link.
> *where* is that link?
>
> --
> Apache
> POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
> Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
> ICQ: 146690431
Sorry, my bad. (Ooops!)
Here is the link:
http://www.underlinux.com.br/modules.php?name=Sections&sop=viewarticle&artid=100
[]s
--
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
thanks! :-)
--
Apache
POV-Ray Cloth experiments: http://geitenkaas.dns2go.com/experiments/
Email: apa### [at] yahoocom
ICQ: 146690431
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
