POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.programming : povray modularity Server Time
21 Dec 2024 20:16:27 EST (-0500)
  povray modularity (Message 1 to 3 of 3)  
From: Wizard
Subject: povray modularity
Date: 29 Apr 2008 18:25:00
Message: <web.48179f56aba177da375579a60@news.povray.org>
As I told it before, adding modularity, can also 'could' resolve and a least
keep  the unofficial patches a little 'official' like Apache WebServer.... At
least Povray core code would need much less changes when someone apply some
function improvement.... what all you think ?????? I hope that my opinion could
be heard by the povray core team.....


Post a reply to this message

From: Le Forgeron
Subject: Re: povray modularity
Date: 1 May 2008 05:45:25
Message: <48199135$1@news.povray.org>
Le Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:21:10 -0400, Wizard a modifié des petits morceaux
de l'univers pour nous faire lire :

> As I told it before, adding modularity, can also 'could' resolve and a
> least keep  the unofficial patches a little 'official' like Apache
> WebServer.... At least Povray core code would need much less changes
> when someone apply some function improvement.... what all you think
> ?????? I hope that my opinion could be heard by the povray core
> team.....

That's why the C++ rewrite is expected (along with multi-core support), 
it would (hopefully) push code into a modular design that could help 
things like the one you are suggesting.

If you can read french, have a try at http://jgrimbert.free.fr/crayon.pdf

Now, if you could define "function improvement" (what do you mean by it, 
short of a hat of tricks to impress dumb people, exactly), that could 
also help people to get involve in your discussion.

"improvement" is such a political empty word, I need real stuff, and I'm 
probably not alone. So what are you thinking about ? New texture ? new 
shape ? new colour system ? new ray/colour interaction ? other things ?

As an old timer, I remember a period which was full of patches 
proposal... and the nightmare it was lead to the long line of mega-pov 
(and variants!). 

And if you are thinking of something else than 100% Code-Patch, just 
forget it. Povray is source code, and portable.



P.S.: Blank/Empty lines are cheap, use them to make your text breaths.

P.S.2: ... (ellipsis) are a sign of unfinished thought (I know, I use 
them a lot too), but why would you expect us to finish what you have not 
found worth of finishing yourself. Don't be lazy when you want to push a 
subject.


Post a reply to this message

From: Wizard
Subject: Re: povray modularity
Date: 1 May 2008 20:25:00
Message: <web.481a5d936990d3d4375579a60@news.povray.org>
Le Forgeron <jgr### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Le Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:21:10 -0400, Wizard a modifié des petits morceaux

>
> > As I told it before, adding modularity, can also 'could' resolve and a
> > least keep  the unofficial patches a little 'official' like Apache
> > WebServer.... At least Povray core code would need much less changes
> > when someone apply some function improvement.... what all you think
> > ?????? I hope that my opinion could be heard by the povray core
> > team.....
>
> That's why the C++ rewrite is expected (along with multi-core support),
> it would (hopefully) push code into a modular design that could help
> things like the one you are suggesting.
>
> If you can read french, have a try at http://jgrimbert.free.fr/crayon.pdf
>
> Now, if you could define "function improvement" (what do you mean by it,
> short of a hat of tricks to impress dumb people, exactly), that could
> also help people to get involve in your discussion.
>
> "improvement" is such a political empty word, I need real stuff, and I'm
> probably not alone. So what are you thinking about ? New texture ? new
> shape ? new colour system ? new ray/colour interaction ? other things ?
>
> As an old timer, I remember a period which was full of patches
> proposal... and the nightmare it was lead to the long line of mega-pov
> (and variants!).
>
> And if you are thinking of something else than 100% Code-Patch, just
> forget it. Povray is source code, and portable.
>
>
>
> P.S.: Blank/Empty lines are cheap, use them to make your text breaths.
>
> P.S.2: ... (ellipsis) are a sign of unfinished thought (I know, I use
> them a lot too), but why would you expect us to finish what you have not
> found worth of finishing yourself. Don't be lazy when you want to push a
> subject.

  Yes, ellipsis is a sign of unfinshed thought. How you yourself also use. And
you are a native speaker from a language derived from latin too. Happy with this
.......


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.