Darren New wrote:

> My primary regret is that by the time such things become affordable for 
> *me*, I'll likely be dead.

Au contrare, the world is overpopulated *now*.

Imagine what would happen if X billion people were born every year but 
0.9 X people *didn't* also die! o_O

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> 
>> My primary regret is that by the time such things become affordable 
>> for *me*, I'll likely be dead.
> 
> Au contrare, the world is overpopulated *now*.
> 
> Imagine what would happen if X billion people were born every year but 
> 0.9 X people *didn't* also die! o_O

And why would that change my regret?  Being alive is *always* a curable 
condition.


-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message

"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:4b50ecb5$1@news.povray.org...
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> > Darren New wrote:
> >
> >> My primary regret is that by the time such things become affordable
> >> for *me*, I'll likely be dead.

> > Au contrare, the world is overpopulated *now*.

> > Imagine what would happen if X billion people were born every year but
> > 0.9 X people *didn't* also die! o_O

> And why would that change my regret?  Being alive is *always* a curable
> condition.

Opposing "curing" death on grounds of overpopulation (!?) - is it any
different from opposing peace, sanitation, drugs... etc on the same grounds?

Post a reply to this message

Darren New wrote:
> We have a really easy one, based on visible photons. It's called "take
> your
> clothes off."  Somehow, people don't want that one tho. People would
> actually rather die in flight than strip naked before a stranger.

No, I would rather risk a *super-minimal chance* of dying in flight because 
of a terrorist than strip naked before a stranger.

The chance of dying in a plane because a terrorist blows it up is way WAY 
lower than the chance of dying in a plane because of an accident.

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
> > We have a really easy one, based on visible photons. It's called "take
> > your
> > clothes off."  Somehow, people don't want that one tho. People would
> > actually rather die in flight than strip naked before a stranger.
>
> No, I would rather risk a *super-minimal chance* of dying in flight because
> of a terrorist than strip naked before a stranger.
>
> The chance of dying in a plane because a terrorist blows it up is way WAY
> lower than the chance of dying in a plane because of an accident.

but paranoia always makes things look bigger than they actually are.

In any case, getting everyone naked is not practical at all:  can you imagine
endlessly slow airport lines while people undress and dress up again?

Post a reply to this message

nemesis wrote:
> In any case, getting everyone naked is not practical at all:  can you
> imagine endlessly slow airport lines while people undress and dress up
> again?

Isn't the middle of one of those endlessly slow airport lines a good place 
for the suicide bomber to blow himself up, instead of inside the plane?

Post a reply to this message

Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > Warp wrote:
> > >   There's a difference. Daying of old age is a natural cause.
>


>   But there's nothing we can do to prevent earthquakes, tsunamis and
> growing old, but we can ostensibly do something about traffic accidents.
>
> --
>                                                           - Warp

Yes. And it would also be possible, for example, to prevent several thousands of
deaths each year in hospitals in UK, Germany or the USA caused by MRSA and MSSA
bacteria, just another example.

But obviously there is not much money in it (or not enough money for the "right"
people and lobbyists) as with airport security.

I suspect the whole hysteria about airport security in the media has been
kindled by companys developing security equipment, like that "naked scanner".
And now, since money for development in such technologies has already been
invested, those people would naturally like to see it established at airports,
because there's quite a bit of money in selling it. Just my opinion.

And when they have been successfully established, well, why not go for train
stations, ferrys and whatever ... because there's still a lot more money in it
....

What's worrying me is not so much the fact that there are certain lobbies, who
try to establish such things as hi-tech security equipment. But rather my
impression that the majority's opinions are manipulated increasingly
successfully by the media in a way that people believe that such things are
really necessary for their security without any regard to privacy, practical
value, common sense or whatever.

Best wishes

Simone

Post a reply to this message

Nicolas Alvarez escreveu:
> nemesis wrote:
>> In any case, getting everyone naked is not practical at all:  can you
>> imagine endlessly slow airport lines while people undress and dress up
>> again?
> 
> Isn't the middle of one of those endlessly slow airport lines a good place 
> for the suicide bomber to blow himself up, instead of inside the plane?

yeah, but it's not as dramatic as a in plane going down in flames and 
crashing onto houses below.  A terrorist could well just walk among some 
crowd and do it as well.

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

Post a reply to this message

nemesis wrote:
> A terrorist could well just walk among some crowd and do it as well.

Which is exactly what they do in many other countries.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message

On 01/15/10 06:18, Warp wrote:
>    There's a difference. Daying of old age is a natural cause.

	Attitudes like that is why we keep dying from old age.

-- 
I'm addicted to placebos. I'd give them up, but it wouldn't make any 
difference. - Steven Wright

Post a reply to this message