POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Solve for x Server Time
5 Sep 2024 07:25:50 EDT (-0400)
  Solve for x (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Mike the Elder
Subject: Solve for x
Date: 16 Sep 2009 08:55:01
Message: <web.4ab0df4f4d65ddcd85627c70@news.povray.org>
Professor Theo Rem and Professor Perry Metric, who were both mathematicians and
movie buffs, had just returned from a round of golf.  Theo presented Perry with
the problem shown in the image.  After puzzling for a bit, Perry proclaimed,




Perry, however, continued to insist that three was the correct solution. After
discussing the reasons for their difference, they decided that Professor
Featherstone would have to be the one to resolve the dispute and went off to
seek a consultation.  The eminent ornithologist was able to answer their simple
question of taxonomy easily, whereupon Theo was forced to admit that Perry had
been correct all along.  The solution was indeed three.

What did Professor Featherstone tell them?

(I will post the solution and explanation tomorrow.  Please post only replies
that do not give it away until then.)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'solveforx.jpg' (24 KB)

Preview of image 'solveforx.jpg'
solveforx.jpg


 

From: Mike the Elder
Subject: Re: Solve for x
Date: 17 Sep 2009 08:50:01
Message: <web.4ab22f82fa478bd085627c70@news.povray.org>
"Mike the Elder" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Professor Theo Rem and Professor Perry Metric, who were both mathematicians and
> movie buffs, had just returned from a round of golf.  Theo presented Perry with
> the problem shown in the image.  After puzzling for a bit, Perry proclaimed,

>

>
> Perry, however, continued to insist that three was the correct solution. After
> discussing the reasons for their difference, they decided that Professor
> Featherstone would have to be the one to resolve the dispute and went off to
> seek a consultation.  The eminent ornithologist was able to answer their simple
> question of taxonomy easily, whereupon Theo was forced to admit that Perry had
> been correct all along.  The solution was indeed three.
>
> What did Professor Featherstone tell them?
>
> (I will post the solution and explanation tomorrow.  Please post only replies
> that do not give it away until then.)

======================================================================
The solution as promised:

Professor Featherstone told them that falcons are not eagles.
Specifically, falcons are members of the family Falconidae, while eagles are
members of the distinctly separate family Accipitridae.











x  = (p+2) - (p-1)
x  = 3

Corollary: Math professors and I. T. Coordinators have WAY to much time on their
hands.


Post a reply to this message

From: Kevin Wampler
Subject: Re: Solve for x
Date: 17 Sep 2009 12:21:14
Message: <4ab261fa@news.povray.org>
Mike the Elder wrote:



And here I was thinking that I needed to know more movie trivia to solve 
it.  I should have thought about this one a bit more.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Solve for x
Date: 17 Sep 2009 13:32:05
Message: <1js4b5hf7utpm35plgvgsfc83fiie6cgor@4ax.com>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:45:54 EDT, "Mike the Elder" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

>Remember that they had been playing golf.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: alphaQuad
Subject: Re: Solve for x
Date: 18 Sep 2009 13:25:00
Message: <web.4ab3c16dfa478bd05c4890ca0@news.povray.org>
"Mike the Elder" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

> x  = (p+2) - (p-1)
> x  = 3
>
> Corollary: Math professors and I. T. Coordinators have WAY to much time on their
> hands.

great I can now finish that nagging unification theory, wft? now get back to
work!


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike the Elder
Subject: Re: Solve for x
Date: 18 Sep 2009 13:45:00
Message: <web.4ab3c5bafa478bd085627c70@news.povray.org>
"alphaQuad" <alp### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> "Mike the Elder" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>
> > x  = (p+2) - (p-1)
> > x  = 3
> >
> > Corollary: Math professors and I. T. Coordinators have WAY to much time on their
> > hands.
>
> great I can now finish that nagging unification theory, wft? now get back to
> work!

Good luck with that.  Remember: No GUTs no glory!
(and keep on your TOEs)

....What else shall we pun about?

Best Regards,
Mike C.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.