![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Made a couple of new videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG7gUo5v2K0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ-hOV3cW2g
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Made a couple of new videos:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG7gUo5v2K0
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ-hOV3cW2g
>
Nice. I've always liked greensleeves, and that was a nice version.
I'm a little surprised you can do tremolo that way on an instrument with
frets. Only a little surprised, mind, but I thought the idea of the frets
was to make sure the string length was always the same even if your finger
was a bit off.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> I'm a little surprised you can do tremolo that way on an instrument with
> frets. Only a little surprised, mind, but I thought the idea of the frets
> was to make sure the string length was always the same even if your finger
> was a bit off.
If you make a vibrating motion with your finger, it will change the
tension of the string just so slightly, giving you a slight tremolo
effect. Of course it's not as pronounced as you can do eg. on a violin
or other fretless instruments (where the tremolo is not really a question
of changing the tension of the string but its length), but clearly audible
nevertheless (especially if you emphasize it).
Of course you could also pitch-bend by stretching the string upwards or
downwards, but that's not really a tremolo.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/10/2010 5:53 PM, Warp wrote:
> Made a couple of new videos:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG7gUo5v2K0
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ-hOV3cW2g
>
I like you version of Greensleeves, too.
taking a test. A more relaxed performance would make it better. I say
this as a positive criticism.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen <mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
> you look so serious
I'm Finn.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/10/2010 8:39 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
>> you look so serious
>
> I'm Finn.
>
I know that, but it is not against the law to look as if you are
enjoying yourself :-P
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen <mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
> On 10/10/2010 8:39 PM, Warp wrote:
> > Stephen<mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
> >> you look so serious
> >
> > I'm Finn.
> >
> I know that, but it is not against the law to look as if you are
> enjoying yourself :-P
I *am* enjoying myself. You just don't understand the subtleties of
the Finnish male expressions... :P
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/10/2010 9:33 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
>> On 10/10/2010 8:39 PM, Warp wrote:
>>> Stephen<mca### [at] aoldot com> wrote:
>>>> you look so serious
>>>
>>> I'm Finn.
>>>
>
>> I know that, but it is not against the law to look as if you are
>> enjoying yourself :-P
>
> I *am* enjoying myself. You just don't understand the subtleties of
> the Finnish male expressions... :P
>
I stand corrected ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:13:02 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>> Made a couple of new videos:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DG7gUo5v2K0
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQ-hOV3cW2g
>>
>>
> Nice. I've always liked greensleeves, and that was a nice version.
>
> I'm a little surprised you can do tremolo that way on an instrument with
> frets. Only a little surprised, mind, but I thought the idea of the
> frets was to make sure the string length was always the same even if
> your finger was a bit off.
Both are very good recordings - really liked them both. Technically,
though, what Warp was doing wasn't a tremolo, but was vibrato (a slight
vibration in pitch). :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> what Warp was doing wasn't a tremolo, but was vibrato (a slight
> vibration in pitch). :-)
TIL...
Don't blame me, I play percussion. ;-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |