|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
http://tinyurl.com/39gxbls
Yes, that's right. An official intel.com software blog is talking about
Haskell. And they've released some software too.
As it turns out, the software is a complete reimplementation of CnC in
100% pure Haskell. (So, its performance depends on how good GHC is.) I
have no idea how complete it is compared to the C++ version (nor how
fast...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
As this provoked so much interest:
http://tinyurl.com/37zh46l
From here you can navigate to *all* the blog posts about this, not just
post #1 which I linked to before.
I haven't finished reading the paper myself. It does look impressive
though, doesn't it? "Ryan Newton, Intel; Chih-Ping Chen, Intel; Simon
Marlow, Microsoft" They're all big boys. And they're submitting an
official paper. And it's all about Haskell...
Yes, it's true. I'm such a rabbid fanboy. :-$
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> I haven't finished reading the paper myself.
...but I have now. ;-)
Interesting stuff, as always. And, as usual, the main conclusion is
"hmm, we really ought to improve the GC engine"...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |