 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/10/2010 9:42 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 3:12 PM, Mike Raiford wrote:
>> On 6/9/2010 10:16 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The radio show is the original and what I prefer of all of them. :-)
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>> do you know if it is attainable on CD or as MP3's?
>>
>
> If you look under enough rocks you will be able to find it. Oo ar! Me
> matee. ;-)
>
> Or you could go to the BBC shop. http://tinyurl.com/35uc2rl
>
I suppose I could have googled it ;) but I was too busy being
conversational to be bothered.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:36:09 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>> *buzz* More Hesitation! ;-)
>>
> That version of *ME* has passed the event horizon. You will need to go
> to the Eschaton.
It sounds like you're on the Escher Loop.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:12:17 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
> On 6/9/2010 10:16 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>
>> The radio show is the original and what I prefer of all of them. :-)
>>
>> Jim
>
> do you know if it is attainable on CD or as MP3's?
It is on CD - I have all 5 series that way (the first two are the
originals; the final 3 were done after Adams died). You can also find
MP3s from recordings from the radio on the 'net, I'm told (I didn't need
to seek those out since I have the CDs).
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:42:05 -0400, nemesis wrote:
> seems like I missed a lot of fun here... :)
>
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:16:07 -0500, Mike Raiford wrote:
>> > That was a great book series. Same about the movie. I've not heard
>> > the radio shows or seen TV shows. I need to sample those some time.
>>
>> The radio show is the original and what I prefer of all of them. :-)
>
> The radio show has impecable acting and is way too much fun. But I
> still find that much more of Adams ingenious parody, irony and many
> layers of interlocking themes to be best served in the books... :)
There's a certain degree of truth to that, because a lot of the subtext
is not in the dialogue, but rather in the narration. Some of it comes
through in the radio series (because of the use of the book as the
narrator), but some does get missed.
> many were let down by the last one for its abrupt and harsh ending, but
> it's one of the best written...
Yes, though in the 5th radio series, they did work around it - and from
what I've read both of the production and from The Salmon of Doubt, Adams
did intend to write another book that explained the characters'
reappearance. I think Maggs said that at least part of the idea he used
to bring them back was Adams' own.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/06/2010 9:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:36:09 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>>> *buzz* More Hesitation! ;-)
>>>
>> That version of *ME* has passed the event horizon. You will need to go
>> to the Eschaton.
>
> It sounds like you're on the Escher Loop.
>
Phew! Saved by the good doctor. After a dull trip lasting several
subjective lifetimes, all I can say is “Mornington Crescent”
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/06/2010 6:15 PM, Mike Raiford wrote:
>>> do you know if it is attainable on CD or as MP3's?
>>>
>>
>> If you look under enough rocks you will be able to find it. Oo ar! Me
>> matee. ;-)
>>
>> Or you could go to the BBC shop. http://tinyurl.com/35uc2rl
>>
>
> I suppose I could have googled it ;) but I was too busy being
> conversational to be bothered.
And I thought that conversation had died. :-)
Well done that man. :-D
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:37:34 +0100, Stephen wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 9:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:36:09 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>> *buzz* More Hesitation! ;-)
>>>>
>>> That version of *ME* has passed the event horizon. You will need to go
>>> to the Eschaton.
>>
>> It sounds like you're on the Escher Loop.
>>
>>
> Phew! Saved by the good doctor. After a dull trip lasting several
> subjective lifetimes, all I can say is “Mornington Crescent”
Aw!
And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/06/2010 5:31 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:37:34 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 10/06/2010 9:19 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:36:09 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> *buzz* More Hesitation! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> That version of *ME* has passed the event horizon. You will need to go
>>>> to the Eschaton.
>>>
>>> It sounds like you're on the Escher Loop.
>>>
>>>
>> Phew! Saved by the good doctor. After a dull trip lasting several
>> subjective lifetimes, all I can say is “Mornington Crescent”
>
> Aw!
>
> And I had my next move worked out, even. :-/
>
Ah! Well. It just goes to show…
But after falling into a black hole and travelling halfway round the
known universe then two and a half times round the multiverse, being
turned inside out and back to front. Only to find I’m back where I
started. You grudge me taking the shortest route?
--
Best Regards,
Stephanie ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
*hides before the wabbit season becomes Nicolas season*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/06/2010 11:20 PM, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Haven't you two hijacked this thread enough already?
>
> *hides before the wabbit season becomes Nicolas season*
>
Who started it?
Jim has every right to hijack his own thread if he wants and at least
Well actually I don't know what comes after "at least" But if I did I'd
say it. So there :-P
Tol you, didn't I. ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
