 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Content-aware fill.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Yes, we're traveling togeher,
but to different destinations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/03/2010 3:56 PM, Darren New wrote:
> Content-aware fill.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
>
Almost worth buying for that tool.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On 28/03/2010 3:56 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> Content-aware fill.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
>>
>
> Almost worth buying for that tool.
Or is it?
http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/resynthesizer
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-3-2010 16:56, Darren New wrote:
> Content-aware fill.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
>
My first reaction was: Yikes!
Then I realized that the main use is sort of like like using a photo as
a template to create something new, just like painting or drawing, not
modify an existing photo.
Yet I still don't feel comfortable when anybody can change any picture
so easily. I guess I have to learn to live with an ever changing past.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> Yet I still don't feel comfortable when anybody can change any picture
> so easily. I guess I have to learn to live with an ever changing past.
I think this has been the case for a little while now... It's just that
this supposedly makes it easier. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> My first reaction was: Yikes!
Actually, I thought that too.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Yes, we're traveling together,
but to different destinations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yet I still don't feel comfortable when anybody can change any picture so
>> easily. I guess I have to learn to live with an ever changing past.
>
> I think this has been the case for a little while now... It's just that
> this supposedly makes it easier. ;-)
Nothing really new. Even Stalin had photos changed to remove persons from a
photo or "clean" trash away.
He had it done the hard way, by hand-painting the photos (or negatives).
Today it is just faster, cheaper and more perfect. As long as there are
photos around they have been altered and faked. Every photo set is a
manipulation, anyway. If you go to a photographer he will try his utmost to
show your nice side in a photo.
Apart from this: the tool (if it really works this nice in reality, a big
if) would be very nice. I have done my share of painting a grey sky blue, a
patchy brown lawn green, do away with trashbins and so on myself.
I sometimes feel like I'm in Wonderland - I'm painting the roses red. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel <byt### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> On 28-3-2010 16:56, Darren New wrote:
> > Content-aware fill.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
> >
> My first reaction was: Yikes!
>
> Then I realized that the main use is sort of like like using a photo as
> a template to create something new, just like painting or drawing, not
> modify an existing photo.
> Yet I still don't feel comfortable when anybody can change any picture
> so easily. I guess I have to learn to live with an ever changing past.
It's much better than just that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ScWu7pG7r0
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30-3-2010 1:18, TC wrote:
>>> Yet I still don't feel comfortable when anybody can change any picture so
>>> easily. I guess I have to learn to live with an ever changing past.
>> I think this has been the case for a little while now... It's just that
>> this supposedly makes it easier. ;-)
>
> Nothing really new. Even Stalin had photos changed to remove persons from a
> photo or "clean" trash away.
I am fully aware of that. The difference is that now any 12yo might be
able to remove dad from the family pictures because he does not want her
to come home after 1 am on saterday.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
4BB### [at] gmailcom...
>> Nothing really new. Even Stalin had photos changed to remove persons from
>> a photo or "clean" trash away.
>
> I am fully aware of that. The difference is that now any 12yo might be
> able to remove dad from the family pictures because he does not want her
> to come home after 1 am on saterday.
ROTFL nice !
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
