|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Yeah, because a high vacuum is easy to come by. Oh, wait...
Well, yeah, it is. It's called a bell jar.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XJcZ-KoL9o
(Note - the next video after the one I posted.)
You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
quarter each, too. It's not like you need interstellar-space vacuum to
prove the point.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yeah, because a high vacuum is easy to come by. Oh, wait...
>
> Well, yeah, it is. It's called a bell jar.
You'd need a pretty damned big bell jar to drop an object any
significant distance.
> You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
> quarter each, too.
Really?
The London Science Museum has a bell inside a jar with a vacuum pump.
But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you could
describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of scientific
equipment.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> Well I probably don’t think of hp as being anything as other than what
> non-technical people say. Who knows what work a horse can do nowadays?
> If the health and safety or animal welfare people allow it ;)
>
In that, my friend, you are absolutely right.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> You'd need a pretty damned big bell jar to drop an object any
> significant distance.
Somewhat larger than the distance it takes to see a feather and a ball
bearing falling at different speeds in atmosphere.
>> You can go to edmond's scientific and buy bottles of vacuum for like a
>> quarter each, too.
>
> Really?
Yes. Ever get blood drawn? How do you think that works?
> But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you could
> describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of scientific
> equipment.
http://www.google.com/products?q=vacuum+pumps+for+sale
Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Yes. Ever get blood drawn? How do you think that works?
Presumably they just use a syringe. I wasn't looking at the time; I was
in far too much pain...
>> But last I checked, a pump powerful enough to create anything you
>> could describe as "a vacuum" is an extremely expensive piece of
>> scientific equipment.
>
> http://www.google.com/products?q=vacuum+pumps+for+sale
>
> Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
Interesting. I wonder what it costs to buy a large container than can
withstand several thousand Newtons of force trying to crush it...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
>
> Interesting. I wonder what it costs to buy a large container than can
> withstand several thousand Newtons of force trying to crush it...
Really, not all that much. You're really only talking about one atmosphere.
A soda can will keep that much *in*.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> Even the $25 pump gets you down to 29" of vacuum.
>>
>> Interesting. I wonder what it costs to buy a large container than can
>> withstand several thousand Newtons of force trying to crush it...
>
> Really, not all that much. You're really only talking about one
> atmosphere. A soda can will keep that much *in*.
Hmm, 1 atmosphere. That's about 100 kPa. Over a 100 cm^2 area, that's
about 1,000 N. Sounds like a pretty big force to me...
Then again, I was under the impression that a soda can only holds about
0.01 atm of pressure. (1 atm is a LARGE pressure, after all.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> (1 atm is a LARGE pressure, after all.)
No, it's really not. Your car tires hold twice that in a safety-critical
application. A scuba tank easily holds 200 times that much. How much
pressure do you think is on the glass of a huge aquarium (like in an
aquarium museum type building)? Submarines? It's not really that tough to
hold out dozens of atmospheres, let alone one.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hmm, 1 atmosphere. That's about 100 kPa. Over a 100 cm^2 area, that's
> about 1,000 N. Sounds like a pretty big force to me...
Most standard drinks bottles seem to be able to take about 10 atmospheres
pressure:
http://home.people.net.au/~aircommand/procedures.htm
Your mains water pressure is probably around 5 atmospheres.
You really don't need very thick walls to enclose 1 atmosphere safely.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:58:04 +0100, scott wrote:
> Most standard drinks bottles seem to be able to take about 10
> atmospheres pressure:
Interestingly, I was watching Mythbusters last night; one of the myths
they were testing was a "water rocket" myth that involved 3L soda bottles.
They pumped them up to around 90 PSI before they had critical failures.
That's about 400 N per square inch....And that's a soda bottle. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |