 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
>
> While I won't deny having said that, I certainly don't remember it.
Well, you didn't say it in those exact words, but it evaluates to this:
> O2k7
> was designed based on actual measurements of millions of people using
> Office. Most people aren't very logical. :-)
>
;)
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> I think the only time was when I was running Windows 3.1 on a 286 with
> 16MB of RAM, and I asked it to print out a 3D Mandelbrot graph I created
> using VBA... That choked it.
>
16-bit Excel (I actually didn't know one has even existed) already had VBA?
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
> I hear that Windows 2003 Server (?) comes with a "hypervisor" which runs
> on the real metal, and then 2003 itself actually runs as a
> paravirtualised guest. Or something like that...
>
Isn't that 2008, that runs on HyperV?
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>> I hear that Windows 2003 Server (?) comes with a "hypervisor" which runs
>> on the real metal, and then 2003 itself actually runs as a
>> paravirtualised guest. Or something like that...
>>
>
> Isn't that 2008, that runs on HyperV?
Plausibly.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> I honestly can't actually determine whether he's serious or not...
>>> That's called sarcasm, Betelgeuse dude.
>>
>> notice however that there are some people who truly think like that.
>
> ...which is why I thought you might be serious. ;-)
>
It's called Poe's Law.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Can you say how to make the VMware Tools for Linux actually install? :-P
Everyone at my work decided to switch distributions from debian to ubuntu on
the VM because Ubuntu is being kept up to date. OK, so I take the VM, run
the updates, VMware tools crashes, which means everything performs like a
pig, not unlike X11 at 9600 baud.
I say "What's up with that?" They say "Oh, yeah, don't install updates. It
kills VMWare tools."
Well, good thing I spent 3 weeks switching over to the new VM.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>>> I honestly can't actually determine whether he's serious or not...
>>> That's called sarcasm, Betelgeuse dude.
>>
>> notice however that there are some people who truly think like that.
>
> ...which is why I thought you might be serious. ;-)
me, the anti-M$ Linux guy?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> me, the anti-M$ Linux guy?
I think *everybody* is against the idea of an M$ Linux. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>
>> me, the anti-M$ Linux guy?
>
> I think *everybody* is against the idea of an M$ Linux. ;-)
I think I missed a colon...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
>
> Well, good thing I spent 3 weeks switching over to the new VM.
>
Luckily you did have a snapshot from before running the updates. Right?
;)
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
