![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> This is a pretty awesome photo of the whole thing:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Deathvalleysky_nps_big.jpg
>
> Not exactly what you'd see with the naked eye but it gives you the idea.
This is awesomer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Perseid_Meteor.jpg
Here in the name of God does the night sky actually look like this?!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I will admit I don't know much about the geometry of our galaxy, but I was
> under the impression that the disk is hundreds of billions of light years
> "thick",
It's much smaller than you think:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_way
> So... about 36 seconds of arc. Man, that's pretty small.
It's still one of the very few objects in the sky that allows you to
actually see its shape with a good pair of binoculars or a small telescope
though.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> I will admit I don't know much about the geometry of our galaxy, but I
>> was under the impression that the disk is hundreds of billions of
>> light years "thick",
>
> It's much smaller than you think:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_way
Heh, "only" 100,000 light years across and 1,000 light years thick.
Well, that's the trouble when you start dealing with Really Huge
Numbers, see?
There's a reason why would talk about 4 Terabytes rather than
4,000,000,000,000 bytes - it's frighteningly easy to get the number of
digits wrong! ;-)
Obligatory XKCD:
http://xkcd.com/558/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> This is a pretty awesome photo of the whole thing:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Deathvalleysky_nps_big.jpg
>
> Not exactly what you'd see with the naked eye but it gives you the idea.
I always wonder how they get these type of photos.
I mean this must be a pretty long exposure to get that detail? But since
the Earth is rotating, either the ground or the sky is going to get motion
blurred. Is this a photoshop of two images, or can they really get a photo
like that in one shot?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> This is awesomer:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Perseid_Meteor.jpg
>
> Here in the name of God does the night sky actually look like this?!
Well, that's an even longer exposure than the one I posted (you can tell by the
way the stars are slightly elongated), so no, that's not exactly what you'd see
by eye either. But similar!
A shame there's only one meteor visible there, I was expecting more...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"scott" <sco### [at] scott com> wrote:
> > I will admit I don't know much about the geometry of our galaxy, but I was
> > under the impression that the disk is hundreds of billions of light years
> > "thick",
>
> It's much smaller than you think:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_way
I always remember galactic vital statistics by knowing all the lyrics to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_song
:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I always remember galactic vital statistics by knowing all the lyrics to this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_song
>
> :-)
Is that something like the song about the table of elements?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"scott" <sco### [at] scott com> wrote:
> > This is a pretty awesome photo of the whole thing:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Deathvalleysky_nps_big.jpg
> >
> > Not exactly what you'd see with the naked eye but it gives you the idea.
>
> I always wonder how they get these type of photos.
>
> I mean this must be a pretty long exposure to get that detail? But since
> the Earth is rotating, either the ground or the sky is going to get motion
> blurred. Is this a photoshop of two images, or can they really get a photo
> like that in one shot?
I'm not sure. The fact that it's a nearly-complete panorama makes it even more
complicated - I guess it must have been unwrapped from a fisheye.
I'd think it was a single shot. I bet you could get away with up to a minute of
exposure, and it's very wide angle so any movement would be less noticeable.
Any expert photographers here want to comment?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> > I always remember galactic vital statistics by knowing all the lyrics to this:
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_song
> >
> > :-)
>
> Is that something like the song about the table of elements?
Similar, but more catchy ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Is that something like the song about the table of elements?
>
> Similar, but more catchy ;-)
Heh. I still enjoy listening to TMBG exclaim that "the Sun is a mass of
incandescent gas". ;-)
BUT EVEN WHEN IT'S OUT OF SIGHT THE SUN SHINES NIGHT AND DAY!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |