 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ah, the world was too well, that's why I had to upgrade to "Lenny"...
Just tried to compile POV-Ray 3.7.0.beta.34 again with the Intel
compiler, only to find that it now aborts compilation with the following
highly informational message:
(0): internal error: backend signals
Now all I managed to find out so far is that this is the Intel
compiler's way of saying "Something's wrong, shouldn't happen"...
Geez, why on earth did I upgrade in the first place?
Maybe I need to do what any sane Windows user would do: Re-install the
Intel compiler...?
Then again, a sane Windows user would probably re-install the whole
system from scratch... after all, what important stuff do I have on the
system that's not neatly placed in my home directory?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka schrieb:
>
> Maybe I need to do what any sane Windows user would do: Re-install the
> Intel compiler...?
>
Guess what: That didn't help - except that the installer explicitly
warned me that the kernel and library versions are not supported by
Intel icpc 11.0...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka schrieb:
>> Maybe I need to do what any sane Windows user would do: Re-install the
>> Intel compiler...?
>>
> Guess what: That didn't help - except that the installer explicitly
> warned me that the kernel and library versions are not supported by
> Intel icpc 11.0...
The good news is, Intel icpc 11.1 does support what I have, and compiles
POV-Ray like a charm again.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> clipka schrieb:
>
>>> Maybe I need to do what any sane Windows user would do: Re-install
>>> the Intel compiler...?
>>>
>> Guess what: That didn't help - except that the installer explicitly
>> warned me that the kernel and library versions are not supported by
>> Intel icpc 11.0...
>
> The good news is, Intel icpc 11.1 does support what I have, and compiles
> POV-Ray like a charm again.
gcc compiles povray like a charm too. And it comes included with every
Linux. :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis schrieb:
> clipka wrote:
>> clipka schrieb:
>>
>>>> Maybe I need to do what any sane Windows user would do: Re-install
>>>> the Intel compiler...?
>>>>
>>> Guess what: That didn't help - except that the installer explicitly
>>> warned me that the kernel and library versions are not supported by
>>> Intel icpc 11.0...
>>
>> The good news is, Intel icpc 11.1 does support what I have, and
>> compiles POV-Ray like a charm again.
>
> gcc compiles povray like a charm too. And it comes included with every
> Linux. :P
See my recent posting on povray.unix for how the GNU compiler doesn't.
And see Warp's recent posting there, suggesting to use a C++ compiler
instead of a C compiler :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka wrote:
> nemesis schrieb:
>>> The good news is, Intel icpc 11.1 does support what I have, and
>>> compiles POV-Ray like a charm again.
>>
>> gcc compiles povray like a charm too. And it comes included with
>> every Linux. :P
>
> See my recent posting on povray.unix for how the GNU compiler doesn't.
>
> And see Warp's recent posting there, suggesting to use a C++ compiler
> instead of a C compiler :-P
g++, sure. And I remember I just did compile 3.7 beta 33 with it...
well, gotta check out the latest build, if it's been already updated for
Linux...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis schrieb:
> g++, sure. And I remember I just did compile 3.7 beta 33 with it...
>
> well, gotta check out the latest build, if it's been already updated for
> Linux...
Yes, the beta.34 source distribution for Linux has been out for quite a
while now (big deal, with beta.35 being a month overdue already...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> nemesis schrieb:
>
> > g++, sure. And I remember I just did compile 3.7 beta 33 with it...
> >
> > well, gotta check out the latest build, if it's been already updated for
> > Linux...
>
> Yes, the beta.34 source distribution for Linux has been out for quite a
> while now (big deal, with beta.35 being a month overdue already...)
You shouldn't do that. I'm a lazy guy! That's it, I'll wait one month over...
:P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis schrieb:
>> Yes, the beta.34 source distribution for Linux has been out for quite a
>> while now (big deal, with beta.35 being a month overdue already...)
>
> You shouldn't do that. I'm a lazy guy! That's it, I'll wait one month over...
> :P
Dunno. Maybe you shouldn't hold your breath until beta.35 sees the light
of day /plus/ some more weeks until the Linux code is made available...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
