![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Can't say I really notice a huge difference for plain text printed at
> different resolutions - then again, maybe it depends how crispy your
> paper is...
Find a piece of text printed at 300DPI on a nice bond paper, then one
printed at 1200, and you can easily see the difference.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> So is a 1nm object, if you have a sufficiently powerful microscope. :-P
Har har - a "naked eye" doesn't usually have a microscope attached to it :-)
> So 100um might be visible from 40cm away then?
For me it is.
BTW I just checked and I'm sitting about 60 cm away from my monitor, which
equates to 145 dpi if I assume 1/60 degree resolution of my eye. My monitor
is 95 dpi, so I guess it could be a bit higher resolution, or I need to sit
further back :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/14/2009 3:28 AM, scott wrote:
> BTW I just checked and I'm sitting about 60 cm away from my monitor,
> which equates to 145 dpi if I assume 1/60 degree resolution of my eye.
> My monitor is 95 dpi, so I guess it could be a bit higher resolution, or
> I need to sit further back :-)
I'm just happy I can't see any sub-pixels in _my_ monitor. :)
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |