 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, yes, and therein lies the problem. I've seen this happen dozens of
> times. :-)
That's what the "show latest updated threads" page is for :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/8/2009 11:21 AM, clipka wrote:
> Neeum Zawan schrieb:
>
>> The best system I ever worked with was the various BBS networks
>> (Fidonet, etc). Much better than USENET, much better than web groups,
>> much better than mailing lists...
>
> Ah, good old Fight-o-Net... yeah, those were the days!
Heh Memories ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> That's what the "show latest updated threads" page is for :-)
If I'm searching on google, what makes you think I'm finding threads from
this year, let alone "latest updated"? :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> That's what the "show latest updated threads" page is for :-)
>
> If I'm searching on google, what makes you think I'm finding threads from
> this year, let alone "latest updated"? :-)
I assume that if you noticed a thread had been moved into a different
category, you'd be visiting the forum regularly. Unless you were unlucky
and the thread was years old but only moved a few days ago and Google hadn't
found the newly moved version yet (then I guess you could use that forum's
search feature, or simply view Google's cached version).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
>>> That's what the "show latest updated threads" page is for :-)
>>
>> If I'm searching on google, what makes you think I'm finding threads
>> from this year, let alone "latest updated"? :-)
>
> I assume that if you noticed a thread had been moved into a different
> category, you'd be visiting the forum regularly.
No. I said all I find is someone who posts "Your thread was in the wrong
place. I moved it to the right place" without any indication of where the
"right" place is.
@Wheee. Around in circles.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:47:46 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> No. I said all I find is someone who posts "Your thread was in the wrong
> place. I moved it to the right place" without any indication of where
> the "right" place is.
Search by username and approximate date (from the move message),
generally would give you an idea of what they were talking about. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> 3) They are usually way better organised into sub- and sub-sub-forums,
> rather than just a huge list of threads
Yeah right.
In NNTP, you'd create povray.radiosity. In a web forum, there's a
"The official 'I need help with radiosity' thread" with ten thousand posts.
> 6) "Sticky" threads always appear at the top of the list with things like
> the FAQ and anything else related to the subject
Wrong tool for the job. Get a wiki!
I have never been on usenet, but I very much prefer private NNTP servers
like this one to a web-based forum.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:25:00 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> In NNTP, you'd create povray.radiosity. In a web forum, there's a "The
> official 'I need help with radiosity' thread" with ten thousand posts.
That depends on the web forum software and administrators understanding
of how to set up what they want. Some forums treat a "thread" as a
subforum, but most that I visit don't do that.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:4ad3bace@news.povray.org...
>> 6) "Sticky" threads always appear at the top of the list with things like
>> the FAQ and anything else related to the subject
>
> Wrong tool for the job. Get a wiki!
If sticky posts were possible in beta-test there would be one titled "Why
are betas time-limited" and another one titled "How to bypass the time limit
on betas", which would prevent having the same discussion over and over. I
understand that NNTP has its strengths for certain types of discussions
(namely the long-winded rambling kind we have here) but there are very
practical reasons for the popularity of web forums.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gilles Tran wrote:
> which would prevent having the same discussion over and over.
Bwa ha ha ha ha!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
