![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:42:52 -0700 schrieb Darren New:
> Florian Pesth wrote:
>> http://www.hdrtimelapse.com/
>
> Amateur.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msM1I59KbgY#t=3m30s
Nice steampunk :)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:28:46 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> You know what might be cool?
>>>
>>> TIME-LAPSE PHOTOGRAPHY.
>>
>> I'm not sure how a time-lapse photo of something so quick would
>> work....
>
> No, I mean... High-speed photography requires specialised equipment.
> Time lapse only requires a regular camera. So do time lapse [of
> something else].
OIC, it wasn't clear you were changing subjects. ;-) I've done time-
lapse photography with my digital camera - built-in setting for it.
> But since you comment... take a long exposure of a night sky, and you
> get quite an impressive effect. Ever see those photographs with 25
> lightning strikes in the same image? Long exposure. Several flashes
> captured in a single frame. (This *also* requires special equipment,
> mind you...)
Yeah, I've seen that done as well - my camera also can do up to a 25
second exposure, but Canon cameras with CHDK installed can do even longer
times IIRC.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Florian Pesth wrote:
> Nice steampunk :)
The full movie is actually very nice steampunk. :-) The fast-forward
sequences are lovely.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Yep. Like my Nikon F65 (an entry-level SLR).
Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
"special equipment"? :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>
>> Yep. Like my Nikon F65 (an entry-level SLR).
>
> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
> "special equipment"? :-P
If a camera, that cost 300 euros at 2005 while bought as new, is special
equipment, then possibly yes.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>>> Yep. Like my Nikon F65 (an entry-level SLR).
>> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
>> "special equipment"? :-P
>
> If a camera, that cost 300 euros at 2005 while bought as new, is special
> equipment, then possibly yes.
Heh. SLR is much, much cheaper than it used to be...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
>>>> Yep. Like my Nikon F65 (an entry-level SLR).
>>> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
>>> "special equipment"? :-P
>>
>> If a camera, that cost 300 euros at 2005 while bought as new, is special
>> equipment, then possibly yes.
>
> Heh. SLR is much, much cheaper than it used to be...
Yes, if we look back enough. Today I'd say you can't get a decent SLR
for 300e from Finland, since they are all D-SLR's now. F65 still uses
35mm film.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/6/2009 3:08 AM, Invisible wrote:
> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
> "special equipment"? :-P
Mm, New from Fischer-Price: My First Particle accelerator: Comes with
everything needed to build your very own proton accelerator in you own
home. Comes complete with 15MW generators, bubble chamber, and a
large-scale farm of analysis computers and data collection equipment. Be
the first on your block to discover the enigmatic Higgs Boson.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
>> "special equipment"? :-P
>
> Mm, New from Fischer-Price: My First Particle accelerator: Comes with
> everything needed to build your very own proton accelerator in you own
> home. Comes complete with 15MW generators, bubble chamber, and a
> large-scale farm of analysis computers and data collection equipment. Be
> the first on your block to discover the enigmatic Higgs Boson.
WIN!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 schrieb:
>>> Isn't that like claiming an "entry-level particle accelerator" is not
>>> "special equipment"? :-P
>>
>> Mm, New from Fischer-Price: My First Particle accelerator: Comes with
>> everything needed to build your very own proton accelerator in you own
>> home. Comes complete with 15MW generators, bubble chamber, and a
>> large-scale farm of analysis computers and data collection equipment.
>> Be the first on your block to discover the enigmatic Higgs Boson.
I'd guess though that at a university with a strong natural science
branch, they wouldn't call their own local particle accelerator "special
equipment" - because there's actually not much magic in, say, a
Van-de-Graaf- or even a Tandem accelerator, let alone a small Cyclotron,
and a university might well be capable to "DIY" such a thing if they set
their mind to it. (The basic technology has been around since the '30s
of the last century.)
What they /will/ call "special equipment" are probably all the
accessories: Sputter (ion) sources, particle detectors, data analysis
electronics and stuff like that; and they'll be very proud of each of
those thingumajigs they produced themselves. (At Cologne university, for
instance, they develop their own signal processing hardware, including
custom ASICs; they also tried to roll their own detector crystals, but
failed...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |