 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx
Completely unbelievable, what a complete idiot. If this guy even had a half
a brain he would realise that making a real gun look like a toy and
encouraging others to do the same is a *really* bad idea.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott wrote:
> Completely unbelievable, what a complete idiot. If this guy even had a
> half a brain he would realise that making a real gun look like a toy and
> encouraging others to do the same is a *really* bad idea.
Interestingly, there are people who sell things like screwdrivers and
electric drills that are all pink and cutesy. Supposed to appeal to
women doing DIY. (Personally I think it's insulting...)
THIS thing, on the other hand, is... well, scary, actually. O_O
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Interestingly, there are people who sell things like screwdrivers and
> electric drills that are all pink and cutesy. Supposed to appeal to
> women doing DIY.
That's kind of odd way of thinking. Usually only tomboys will use such
tools for anything, and usually tomboys don't like pink and cutesy things.
Their target consumers must form a really, really small minority of the
population.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx
Gotta love the pro-gun comments. "The second amendment is the only
thing standing between us and utter disintegration of the rest of the
constitution! Rawr!" ...um...ok, but...why? Having a Cause is all
well and good, but libertarians being able to own a gun don't actually
form a fundamental pillar of society in the US. The rest of the Bill of
Rights would not suddenly cease to exist if the 2nd amendment hadn't
been in there. You can get your panties in a bunch over your particular
special interest group being denied what you feel are your fundamental
rights, but the fact of the matter is *there are a lot of other people
out there, too*, and when erosion of the rights of minority A does not
equal erosion of the rights of minority B (or majority C), unless you
have something like Political Correctness, nobody's going to care much.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/1/2009 4:49 AM, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>
http://blog.riflegear.com/archive/2007/12/26/hello-kitty-ar-15---evil-black-rifle-meets-cute-and.aspx
Wow. That takes a sick mind to come up with that
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> Gotta love the pro-gun comments. "The second amendment is the only
> thing standing between us and utter disintegration of the rest of the
> constitution! Rawr!" ...um...ok, but...why? Having a Cause is all
> well and good, but libertarians being able to own a gun don't actually
> form a fundamental pillar of society in the US. The rest of the Bill of
> Rights would not suddenly cease to exist if the 2nd amendment hadn't
> been in there. You can get your panties in a bunch over your particular
> special interest group being denied what you feel are your fundamental
> rights, but the fact of the matter is *there are a lot of other people
> out there, too*, and when erosion of the rights of minority A does not
> equal erosion of the rights of minority B (or majority C), unless you
> have something like Political Correctness, nobody's going to care much.
The ones shouting that are the same ones who believe that if the
government gets just a little more corrupt, especially in an
administration that they did not vote for, someone else will use that
2nd amendment right and over throw the government. Some of them really
believe it is the threat of an armed populous that keeps the federal
government in check.
The federal government that has more guns, more chemicals, and more time
than any of those individuals. The government must be terrified.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> The ones shouting that are the same ones who believe that if the
> government gets just a little more corrupt, especially in an
> administration that they did not vote for, someone else will use that
> 2nd amendment right and over throw the government. Some of them really
> believe it is the threat of an armed populous that keeps the federal
> government in check.
>
> The federal government that has more guns, more chemicals, and more time
> than any of those individuals. The government must be terrified.
The irony being.. this kind of BS makes me actually consider being
armed, just to protect myself from all the nut cases, and most of them
are definitely ***nut cases***, who already are. Sadly, the only thing
likely to change this trend towards shear stupidity is a good old
western shootout some place. Betting it will be between a teabagger and
someone they conclude is "liberal" because they wore the wrong shirt to
an anti-liberal rally. Ironically, the wacko politicians are at least
partly right. More people are getting armed because they are fearful and
don't think the cops can help them. What they fail to grasp is that they
realize that a) there are seldom enough cops, and even less now in a
recession, b) many places the cops are in the pocket of local politics,
and some of those **hate** certain neighborhoods, c) crime rates, for
the most part, where dropping before now, especially violent crime, but
that might have reversed, and not because 4 people some place stopped
praying to the right wings dog, d) under the current conditions,
promoting "more" guns is a recipe for disaster, not a solution to making
things safer, in the absence of cops that the government can't/won't pay
for, or which have been corrupted by politics to not help certain parts
of the cities.
All in all, I am much more worried, today, that one of these idiots, who
watched a few too many episodes of Walker Texas Ranger, will shoot
someone for looking too not-right wing enough, than that an army of
liberals will try to storm the capitol building. Why? Because if the
later happens, it will be **because** the WTR sort will have shot a
bunch of people, then holed up in the capitol building, with hostages,
and the right wing spin engine will be busy calling them "freedom
fighters" for it, instead of insane, or terrorist, thereby helping to
cement the civil war these idiots seem to want so badly.
Frankly, I wish they would just save us the idiocy and bloodshed, move
to Texas, secede, and the rest of us where smart enough to let them turn
themselves into a third world country, instead of bothering to stop them.
--
void main () {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Patrick Elliott wrote:
> and most of them
> are definitely ***nut cases***, who already are.
If you're saying that most armed people are nut cases, I think you're wrong.
Many or most vocal armed people are nut cases, but the last poll I saw
showed at least half the houses had a firearm and ammunition somewhere in
the house or garage. And that's self-reported, so all the people who don't
want to admit it showed up as unarmed.
> promoting "more" guns is a recipe for disaster, not a solution to making
> things safer,
I think the evidence is ambivalent on that.
> than that an army of
> liberals will try to storm the capitol building.
You know, this is the first time I've ever heard someone worried about a
citizen coup of the government. Every person arming themselves I've ever
heard of that has been worried about it has been arming themselves to
protect the government from the officials, not to overthrow the government.
I.e., to restore the constitution, not to overthrow the elected government.
I think this is probably a new GOP nutcasism, just like the birthers.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:56:18 -0700, Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Sadly, the only thing likely
> to change this trend towards shear stupidity is a good old western
> shootout some place.
That's unlikely to stop it. We've already had events like that, hell, we
had one here in Salt Lake City about a year ago or so at a shopping mall.
Didn't change a damned thing.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
