POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Technology cycles Server Time
5 Sep 2024 07:25:43 EDT (-0400)
  Technology cycles (Message 8 to 17 of 17)  
<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 23 Sep 2009 12:06:40
Message: <4aba4790$1@news.povray.org>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:16:29 +0200, clipka wrote:

> Invisible schrieb:
>> Hahahaha... OK, check this out. I just saw an advert for a "Notebook
>> privacy filter":
>> 
>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
> 
> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P

That was my thought. ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 23 Sep 2009 16:31:40
Message: <4ABA85AB.70705@hotmail.com>
On 23-9-2009 16:59, Mike Raiford wrote:
> clipka wrote:
> 
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
> 
> It might be. The aspect ratio isn't specified. Though, I'd have to say 
> if it fits a 1.54" screen, the applications for this privacy shield are 
> rather... limited.
> 
That is about the size of a watch. So perhaps we are talking about 
goggles. Which are indeed only viewable for one person. So, what was the 
point?


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 23 Sep 2009 16:55:14
Message: <4aba8b32@news.povray.org>
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> clipka wrote:

> >> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
> > 
> > That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P

> It might be. The aspect ratio isn't specified.

  I think he referred to the absolute measurement rather than a relative
one. A very small screen cannot be considered very "wide", compared to
larger screens.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 24 Sep 2009 11:09:02
Message: <4abb8b8e$1@news.povray.org>
Warp wrote:

>   I think he referred to the absolute measurement rather than a relative
> one. A very small screen cannot be considered very "wide", compared to
> larger screens.

Yes, but widescreen infers a wide aspect ratio. Not necessarily a large 
screen.

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 24 Sep 2009 11:16:09
Message: <4abb8d39$1@news.povray.org>
>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
> 
> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P

As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the 
decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 24 Sep 2009 11:56:50
Message: <4abb96c2$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
> 
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the 
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".

Less obvious to those with full brains. :)

-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 24 Sep 2009 13:19:13
Message: <4abbaa11$1@news.povray.org>
Invisible schrieb:
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
> 
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the 
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".

As should be obvious to anyone with the other half brain, my comment was 
entirely humorous in nature :-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 24 Sep 2009 17:31:51
Message: <4abbe547$1@news.povray.org>
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:16:08 +0100, Invisible wrote:

>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>> 
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
> 
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course
> 15.4".

Well, yeah, but it's not as funny that way. ;-)

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: scott
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 25 Sep 2009 02:51:49
Message: <4abc6885$1@news.povray.org>
> Hahahaha... OK, check this out. I just saw an advert for a "Notebook 
> privacy filter":
>
> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>
> - Keeps information confidential even in high traffic areas.
>
> - Only persons directly in front of the monitor can see the image on 
> screen.
>
> ...in other words, it reduces the viewing angle. (You know, the thing 
> Notebook manufacturers have just spend the last 20 years trying to 
> increase.) WTF?

It allows you to work on the plane, train etc on confidential stuff, also 
good for meetings if you're sat next to the customer :-)  We got a few free 
samples from 3M for our laptops, it works pretty well.  It comes with some 
small clips that you stick onto the laptop, so you can attach and remove the 
filter easily.  There is some electronic version going around (ie you can 
control from software whether the viewing angle is wide or narrow) not sure 
if it is in any product yet (probably some phone in Japan!).


Post a reply to this message

From: clipka
Subject: Re: Technology cycles
Date: 25 Sep 2009 08:29:36
Message: <4abcb7b0@news.povray.org>
scott schrieb:

 > There is some electronic version
> going around (ie you can control from software whether the viewing angle 
> is wide or narrow) not sure if it is in any product yet (probably some 
> phone in Japan!).

That would explain the 1.54" :-)


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.