![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:16:29 +0200, clipka wrote:
> Invisible schrieb:
>> Hahahaha... OK, check this out. I just saw an advert for a "Notebook
>> privacy filter":
>>
>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>
> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
That was my thought. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23-9-2009 16:59, Mike Raiford wrote:
> clipka wrote:
>
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
>
> It might be. The aspect ratio isn't specified. Though, I'd have to say
> if it fits a 1.54" screen, the applications for this privacy shield are
> rather... limited.
>
That is about the size of a watch. So perhaps we are talking about
goggles. Which are indeed only viewable for one person. So, what was the
point?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> clipka wrote:
> >> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
> >
> > That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
> It might be. The aspect ratio isn't specified.
I think he referred to the absolute measurement rather than a relative
one. A very small screen cannot be considered very "wide", compared to
larger screens.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> I think he referred to the absolute measurement rather than a relative
> one. A very small screen cannot be considered very "wide", compared to
> larger screens.
Yes, but widescreen infers a wide aspect ratio. Not necessarily a large
screen.
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>
> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the
decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
>
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".
Less obvious to those with full brains. :)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible schrieb:
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
>
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course 15.4".
As should be obvious to anyone with the other half brain, my comment was
entirely humorous in nature :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:16:08 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>>
>> That's not /particularly/ "widescreen" I'd say :-P
>
> As should be obvious to anyone with half a brain, I merely put the
> decimal place in the wrong position; the correct size is of course
> 15.4".
Well, yeah, but it's not as funny that way. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Hahahaha... OK, check this out. I just saw an advert for a "Notebook
> privacy filter":
>
> - Fits 1.54" widescreen notebook computers.
>
> - Keeps information confidential even in high traffic areas.
>
> - Only persons directly in front of the monitor can see the image on
> screen.
>
> ...in other words, it reduces the viewing angle. (You know, the thing
> Notebook manufacturers have just spend the last 20 years trying to
> increase.) WTF?
It allows you to work on the plane, train etc on confidential stuff, also
good for meetings if you're sat next to the customer :-) We got a few free
samples from 3M for our laptops, it works pretty well. It comes with some
small clips that you stick onto the laptop, so you can attach and remove the
filter easily. There is some electronic version going around (ie you can
control from software whether the viewing angle is wide or narrow) not sure
if it is in any product yet (probably some phone in Japan!).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
scott schrieb:
> There is some electronic version
> going around (ie you can control from software whether the viewing angle
> is wide or narrow) not sure if it is in any product yet (probably some
> phone in Japan!).
That would explain the 1.54" :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |