 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I was thinking more of when everything has been covered in a continuous
> layer of water...
Are you sure that every part between the pylon structure and the cable can
get wet to form a continuous path? It seems to me like part of the design
of the insulator is to keep other parts dry:
http://en.wikivisual.com/images/3/33/Pylon.detail.arp.750pix.jpg
Even if it does *all* get wet, it's going to be a really thin layer of
water, and even non-pure water is not a particularly good conductor, if you
do the math the resistance probably comes out pretty huge.
BTW, that photo also shows the dampers attached on the cables either side of
the fixing point.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:14:41 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>Rain water isn't chemically pure. (Depending on pollution levels.) Once
>the pylon gets wet, it's entire surface is covered in a continuous sheet
>of water, which also covers all of the cables. So why don't they short out?
There are insulators between the cables and pylons so there is no path for the
electricity to flow there. The conductors are spaced far enough apart so that
the electricity cannot jump between them. This is called engineering. ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> I mean, seriously. Any moron can write a bunch of gibberish that doesn't
> make sense. But where's the entertainment in that?!
I don't think everybody can write scripts of that quality. It requires
expertise and talent.
And some people like fiction for entertainment. If you don't like it,
that doesn't mean nobody else souldn't like it either.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Sep 2009 04:41:30 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> It feels like everybody is writing like power cables were bare metal wires
>with nothing covering them. Why?
Because they are uninsulated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysAT@aoldotcom> wrote:
> Because they are uninsulated.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
I don't get it. Is that rubber around the cables a non-insulator?
I don't see bare copper here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electric_transmission_lines.jpg
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> It feels like everybody is writing like power cables were bare metal
> wires
> with nothing covering them.
That's how they are actually:
"While overhead lines are usually bare conductors, rarely overhead insulated
cables are used, usually for short distances (less than a kilometer)."
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overhead_power_line
Insulating them for longer runs just needlessly reduces the amount of
current they can take without overheating.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Rain water isn't chemically pure. (Depending on pollution levels.) Once
>> the pylon gets wet, it's entire surface is covered in a continuous sheet
>> of water, which also covers all of the cables. So why don't they short out?
>
> There are insulators between the cables and pylons so there is no path for the
> electricity to flow there.
Indeed. This is why it works when they're dry.
However, when those insulators are covered with a continuous layer of
water...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3 Sep 2009 04:56:16 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysAT@aoldotcom> wrote:
>> Because they are uninsulated.
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission
>
> I don't get it. Is that rubber around the cables a non-insulator?
>I don't see bare copper here:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electric_transmission_lines.jpg
You won't see copper as aluminium is used. KISS I assume that rubber or a man
made insulator would deteriate over time in such exposed conditions. Also as
Scott said the cables are under a lot of tension that would add to the cost of
connecting them without dammaging the insulation.
I have worked on underwater equipment (not power transmission) and I can tell
you that it is not easy to keep water out of things. So it is much simplier and
cheaper for overhead cables to be left bare and make sure that there is a lot of
space between them.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 10:06:46 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> Rain water isn't chemically pure. (Depending on pollution levels.) Once
>>> the pylon gets wet, it's entire surface is covered in a continuous sheet
>>> of water, which also covers all of the cables. So why don't they short out?
>>
>> There are insulators between the cables and pylons so there is no path for the
>> electricity to flow there.
>
>Indeed. This is why it works when they're dry.
>
>However, when those insulators are covered with a continuous layer of
>water...
Look at the insulators, they are a strange shape. That shape ensures that they
are not covered with a continuous layer of water. Magic, isn't it :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> > It feels like everybody is writing like power cables were bare metal
> > wires
> > with nothing covering them.
> That's how they are actually:
> "While overhead lines are usually bare conductors, rarely overhead insulated
> cables are used, usually for short distances (less than a kilometer)."
Ok, maybe it's just different here (and basically everywhere else I have
been), or they are really good at making it *look* like the cables are
covered in black rubber. I certainly was fooled.
Do they paint them like that?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
