 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New <dne### [at] san rrcom> wrote:
> http://www.cgarchitect.com/news/SIGGRAPH-2009-CHAOS-GROUP-GPU.shtml
"Express Install is not supported on this operating system. To upgrade,
please visit: Flash Player Download Center."
I'm wondering if they are proud about being approximately the only
website in the entire internet which doesn't work in Linux.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:59:31 -0400, Warp wrote:
> I'm wondering if they are proud about being approximately the only
> website in the entire internet which doesn't work in Linux.
Worked fine here on openSUSE 11.1.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> http://www.cgarchitect.com/news/SIGGRAPH-2009-CHAOS-GROUP-GPU.shtml
>
> "Express Install is not supported on this operating system. To upgrade,
> please visit: Flash Player Download Center."
>
> I'm wondering if they are proud about being approximately the only
> website in the entire internet which doesn't work in Linux.
>
Huh? They do have a flash-video there, but that doesn't mean the page
doesn't work on Linux. Heck, I can see the page.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090705
SeaMonkey/1.1.17
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > http://www.cgarchitect.com/news/SIGGRAPH-2009-CHAOS-GROUP-GPU.shtml
>
> "Express Install is not supported on this operating system. To upgrade,
> please visit: Flash Player Download Center."
>
> I'm wondering if they are proud about being approximately the only
> website in the entire internet which doesn't work in Linux.
>
> --
> - Warp
Worked fine on Ubuntu last night. No, I don't dig flash either, still...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:59:31 -0400, Warp wrote:
> > I'm wondering if they are proud about being approximately the only
> > website in the entire internet which doesn't work in Linux.
> Worked fine here on openSUSE 11.1.
How? It refuses to play here. It just gives that message.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Huh? They do have a flash-video there, but that doesn't mean the page
> doesn't work on Linux. Heck, I can see the page.
The text in that page is not very helpful, nor the core content.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Worked fine on Ubuntu last night. No, I don't dig flash either, still...
Flash is not the problem. All flash sites I know of work just fine.
Well, except this one.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp escreveu:
> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> Worked fine on Ubuntu last night. No, I don't dig flash either, still...
>
> Flash is not the problem. All flash sites I know of work just fine.
> Well, except this one.
>
that's weird. BTW, I just followed the link now on Firefox on Vista and
it says it requires Flash 10 to play. Perhaps you just need to upgrade.
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> "Express Install is not supported on this operating system. To upgrade,
> please visit: Flash Player Download Center."
That's not what it means. "Express Install" is Adobe's marketing-speak for
"custom downloader with lots of stupid branding on the screen." They're
saying "Sorry, we haven't ported our downloader to your OS, you'll have to
use FTP or HTTP." :-)
Be happy about it!
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Understanding the structure of the universe
via religion is like understanding the
structure of computers via Tron.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka escreveu:
> Jim Henderson schrieb:
>> Well, and one thing from the demo was that the card in use was
>> described as "not the high-end option" (words to that effect).
>
> I actually happen to have that same GPU (GeForce 285) in my machine. I
> went for that particular graphics card /because/ I didn't intend to get
> the heaviest weapon out there, rather just some decent graphics power
> for a decent price (something to do some fluent Wings3D or Poser work
> with) - so I guess there's heavier artillery /already/ in both the
> gamers' and CG professionals' arsenals.
Not to mention it is hinted in the video that it'd be possible to use
more than one GPU at the same time. CG artists will run amok... XD
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
