Darren New wrote:
> 
> Well, there's lots of differences all over between men and women. Not
> really in the models, tho. It's not like they have the adam's apple or
> the brow ridge molded in, at least not big enough to be obvious.
> 

Yes. My list was based purely on the photo on the linked page.

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
>
> Although technically not mine, I can choose from three and one for which
> the test won't work. Then again I also have a wife. What is missing is a
> girlfriend or I would have had a full house.
> 

If you did have a girlfriend, you'd have a black eye instead of a wife.

-Aero

Post a reply to this message

andrel wrote:
> On 17-6-2009 19:26, Darren New wrote:
>> andrel wrote:
>>> hmm, I think that 'which' should have been a 'who'.
>>
>> "Whom", if you really want to be picky. :-)
>>
> I was thinking about that. Is that old-fashioned or still current?

I don't think correct English ever goes out of style. The incorrect English 
just comes into style. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Insanity is a small city on the western
   border of the State of Mind.

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Now I'm wondering what the hell the difference between "visible man"
>>> and "visible woman" is... o_O
>> 
>> I would imagine there would be significant difference in the
>> reproductive tract.
> 
> Have you seen the size of the models? Would such a difference actually
> be noticable? :-P

I think the *internal* reproductive organs are bigger than you think.

Post a reply to this message

>> Have you seen the size of the models? Would such a difference actually
>> be noticable? :-P
> 
> I think the *internal* reproductive organs are bigger than you think.

Well, maybe. I'm not an expert in this field...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

> It's not hard even with the skin on. Press your fingers to your eyebrow 
> and rub up and down a bit, and you'll feel a little bit of a ridge. Now do 
> that to your wife/girlfriend/secretary(slap! ;-) and you'll notice there 
> is no ridge there. For example.

If it's not your wife/girlfriend/secretary,
then you might need to pay extra to poke em. =P

Post a reply to this message

> ... about those surveys that say Americans don't know where various 
> countries are on a globe.

Funnily enough I overheard an American woman talking to a Finnish girl on a 
plane from Amsterdam to Detroit this week.  The woman asked the girl why she 
was on this plane, as wouldn't it be shorter to go "the other way round, 
past Australia".  Later the girl said that the flight from Helsinki to 
Amsterdam had been about 2 hours, and the woman didn't seem to understand, 
it was as if she really thought Finland was near Japan or something.

Post a reply to this message

scott wrote:

> Funnily enough I overheard an American woman talking to a Finnish girl 
> on a plane from Amsterdam to Detroit this week.  The woman asked the 
> girl why she was on this plane, as wouldn't it be shorter to go "the 
> other way round, past Australia".  Later the girl said that the flight 
> from Helsinki to Amsterdam had been about 2 hours, and the woman didn't 
> seem to understand, it was as if she really thought Finland was near 
> Japan or something.

:facepalm:

As the old saying goes, "It's better to be quite and thought a fool than 
to open your mouth and remove all doubt"



-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:

> As the old saying goes, "It's better to be quite and thought a fool than 
> to open your mouth and remove all doubt"

Would now be a bad time to point out a spelling mistake?

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message

Orchid XP v8 wrote:

> 
> Would now be a bad time to point out a spelling mistake?
> 

Yes. yes it would be.

-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message