|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I still don't get why you can't just mount the file itself...
>
> Because the file is not a block device.
I thought the whole idea of the "device file" abstraction is that
accessing an entire device is no different from accessing a regular
file. And, if that's the case, you'd expect storing a filesystem inside
a file to be no different than storing a filesystem on a device.
And yet, it *is* different - one automatically works, the other requires
you to jump through hoops. Or, loops, in this case...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> The device files still have to exist in the filesystem though. (That's a
> fairly bizare concept in itself...)
It's legacy.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> If you really want to know why someone would pay money for the product,
> look at the page on wikipedia to see the list of features it would be a
> PITA to put together under Linux. For *some* people, time is money. :-)
I guess I currently have more time than money :D
That's a reason why teenagers pirate too. They have more time to try
multiple super-complicated DRM-cracking programs till they get it to work
than they have money to buy a genuine copy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> 2. before you can mount anything loopback, you have to determine which
> device numbers (if any) are free.
Uh, no.
mount -o loop file.iso mountpoint
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> That's a reason why teenagers pirate too. They have more time to try
> multiple super-complicated DRM-cracking programs till they get it to work
> than they have money to buy a genuine copy.
Oh... really? I thought it was because teenagers think they have a
*right* to get whatever they want. (Or possibly becuase they have no
money.) Guess I was wrong... again.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> The device files still have to exist in the filesystem though. (That's
>> a fairly bizare concept in itself...)
>
> It's legacy.
I'll say...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> None of this lets you restore to a partition of a different size or
> backup only the used sectors, or browse the files in the backup over the
> network without decompressing them.
>
> It also doesn't let you clone a new Windows machine from an old one.
Hmmm... Do many companies put themselves in situations that demands such
features ?
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
>> When you are finished, it would be wise to boot from a Knoppix CD
>> and connect an external USB HD (sdb) and do this in order to
>> backup your whole Win NT disk:
>
> Or you could use the free DriveXML that walks you thru the process,
> saving only the space occupied by files, compressing and/or splitting
> the result, and restores just as easily. :-)
Ok, but what is the procedure then for using DriveXML to restore a
system that will not boot ?
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> None of this lets you restore to a partition of a different size or
>> backup only the used sectors, or browse the files in the backup over
>> the network without decompressing them.
>>
>> It also doesn't let you clone a new Windows machine from an old one.
>
> Hmmm... Do many companies put themselves in situations that demands such
> features ?
Sure. When you have 5,000 Windows machines to deploy to your employees, or
if you want to restore the backup to a bigger drive because the old one
failed...
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> Ok, but what is the procedure then for using DriveXML to restore a
> system that will not boot ?
BartPE. Boot into a Windows LiveCD, partition and format the disk, and
start up DriveXML and click "restore". Pretty much like Linux.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
There's no CD like OCD, there's no CD I knoooow!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |