 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> You really do write very well. :-)
Why thank you. :-)
I'm also awesome at a number of other things. I don't know what things,
but there must be something! :-}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:34:34 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>> In case anybody's interested:
>
> You really do write very well. :-)
Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I read his blog entry on it. Very
well written indeed.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-3-2009 17:48, Invisible wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>
>> You really do write very well. :-)
>
> Why thank you. :-)
>
> I'm also awesome at a number of other things. I don't know what things,
> but there must be something! :-}
self pity?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I'm also awesome at a number of other things. I don't know what
>> things, but there must be something! :-}
>
> self pity?
Possibly...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> You really do write very well. :-)
>
> Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I read his blog entry on it. Very
> well written indeed.
Out of curiosity... what exactly is it that I wrote which impressed you
guys so much?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:26:22 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
>>> You really do write very well. :-)
>>
>> Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I read his blog entry on it. Very
>> well written indeed.
>
>Out of curiosity... what exactly is it that I wrote which impressed you
>guys so much?
For me it was an article you wrote to a Haskell board that Darren posted a link
to. I was about making a raytracer in Haskell. I thought that it was very well
written. Not like the "stream of conscience" stuff you write here ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Out of curiosity... what exactly is it that I wrote which impressed you
>> guys so much?
>
> For me it was an article you wrote to a Haskell board that Darren posted a link
> to. I was about making a raytracer in Haskell. I thought that it was very well
> written. Not like the "stream of conscience" stuff you write here ;-)
Now I'm puzzled... I don't recollect writing any such thing.
Maybe I'm going senile in my old age? o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:48:12 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity... what exactly is it that I wrote which impressed you
>>> guys so much?
>>
>> For me it was an article you wrote to a Haskell board that Darren posted a link
>> to. I was about making a raytracer in Haskell. I thought that it was very well
>> written. Not like the "stream of conscience" stuff you write here ;-)
>
>Now I'm puzzled... I don't recollect writing any such thing.
>
>Maybe I'm going senile in my old age? o_O
Does this ring a bell?
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/POV-Ray_SDL_project
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> For me it was an article you wrote to a Haskell board that Darren posted a link
>>> to. I was about making a raytracer in Haskell. I thought that it was very well
>>> written. Not like the "stream of conscience" stuff you write here ;-)
>> Now I'm puzzled... I don't recollect writing any such thing.
>>
>> Maybe I'm going senile in my old age? o_O
>
> Does this ring a bell?
>
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/POV-Ray_SDL_project
Ah... the long lost SDL project... heh. I never did get anywhere with
that one! Maybe I should revisit it?
Interesting thing: That page contains a silly half-arsed setup for
implementing get and set functions. Well you know what? There's now a
library on Hackage which works almost exactly the same way. Apparently
I'm not the first person to have thought of this!
I still think making a scene description language in Haskell would be
quite interesting. Of course, given the size of my "unfinished projects"
collection, it's unlikely to go anywhere soon. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:26:22 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> You really do write very well. :-)
>>
>> Yes, I was thinking the same thing as I read his blog entry on it.
>> Very well written indeed.
>
> Out of curiosity... what exactly is it that I wrote which impressed you
> guys so much?
For me it was the post you wrote about the mountains.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
