 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ah yes, another day, another global policy document to read. This one
talks about a process to "ensure continued continuity". Wonderful stuff...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:4992e24f@news.povray.org...
> Ah yes, another day, another global policy document to read. This one
> talks about a process to "ensure continued continuity". Wonderful stuff...
Well, you have to ensure that the continuity is continued otherwise
non-continued continuity can't be continued.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Ah yes, another day, another global policy document to read. This one
>> talks about a process to "ensure continued continuity". Wonderful stuff...
>
> Well, you have to ensure that the continuity is continued otherwise
> non-continued continuity can't be continued.
Perhaps more worrying is that they have apparently decided that we're
goig to keep a record of every user account ever created... using an
Excel spreadsheet.
*facepalm*
Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:4992e683@news.povray.org...
>>> Ah yes, another day, another global policy document to read. This one
>>> talks about a process to "ensure continued continuity". Wonderful
>>> stuff...
>>
>> Well, you have to ensure that the continuity is continued otherwise
>> non-continued continuity can't be continued.
>
> Perhaps more worrying is that they have apparently decided that we're goig
> to keep a record of every user account ever created... using an Excel
> spreadsheet.
>
> *facepalm*
>
> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
Then step in and advise them accordingly.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Perhaps more worrying is that they have apparently decided that we're goig
>> to keep a record of every user account ever created... using an Excel
>> spreadsheet.
>>
>> *facepalm*
>>
>> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
>
> Then step in and advise them accordingly.
Yes. Because they're *really* going to take notice of what *I* say. :-P
For some reason, my opinion was not deemed necessary when drafting this
procedure. And now it's been finalised. Only *now* do I get to look at
it. Obviously it's not too late to change anything unless I can come up
with a *really* compelling reason. (And "this is an inefficient way to
do it" doesn't count as compelling enough.)
Still, this is what happens when you work for a bunch of people who
don't think things through properly, and who regard you as a clueless
idiot...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Invisible" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
> news:4992e24f@news.povray.org...
>> Ah yes, another day, another global policy document to read. This one
>> talks about a process to "ensure continued continuity". Wonderful stuff...
>
> Well, you have to ensure that the continuity is continued otherwise
> non-continued continuity can't be continued.
>
And don't forget the paradigm shift for results-oriented continuity as
well as ensured global policy and standardization of operations and
procedures ...
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
A different paradigm for user-centralized ad-hoc data visualization and
rapid results-based internalized customer advocacy?
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>
>>
>> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
>
> A different paradigm for user-centralized ad-hoc data visualization and
> rapid results-based internalized customer advocacy?
So... you have found a Markov-chain text generator?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:08:45 +0000, Invisible wrote:
>>> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
>>
>> Then step in and advise them accordingly.
>
> Yes. Because they're *really* going to take notice of what *I* say. :-P
They certainly are guaranteed to not take notice of what you say if you
say nothing.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why...WHY would you do this?? >_<
>>
>> A different paradigm for user-centralized ad-hoc data visualization
>> and rapid results-based internalized customer advocacy?
>
> So... you have found a Markov-chain text generator?
>
lol... nah, just seeing how many buzzwords I can cram into a sentence. :)
--
~Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
