 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A small, incomplete C# app to play with FFTs.
It does require .NET framework 3.5 (Yes, its a big download... just do it!)
Some of the features don't work... UI is based off of the FFT Laboratory
Java applet.
I know I shouldn't be, but I'm shocked at how fast it actually updates.. :)
The sample is bad, since the forward transform scales, where the inverse
does not. Play with the bars on the bottom to do an iFFT, draw a
waveform on the top to play with an FFT...
Have fun.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ffttoy.exe.dat' (23 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I feel like I should be suspicious of an .exe posted by someone whose name I
haven't seen around here before.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Slime" <fak### [at] email address> wrote in message
news:49814121$1@news.povray.org...
>I feel like I should be suspicious of an .exe posted by someone whose name
>I haven't seen around here before.
Don't be, it's Mike Raiford. (Wrong 'From' name).
~Steve~
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> A small, incomplete C# app to play with FFTs.
>
> It does require .NET framework 3.5 (Yes, its a big download... just do
> it!)
>
> Some of the features don't work... UI is based off of the FFT Laboratory
> Java applet.
>
> I know I shouldn't be, but I'm shocked at how fast it actually updates..
> :)
Looks nice and is certainly fast enough here that it seems instantaneous.
You just need a 2D version now to play about with the FFT of images in real
time :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Slime wrote:
> I feel like I should be suspicious of an .exe posted by someone whose name I
> haven't seen around here before.
Sorry, It's me ... I thing I got a bit overzealous with my despamming of
my e-mail address :)
Boy did that post look suspicious.. lol.
The username almost screams "Try me I'm a spambot.. its the latest and
greatest virus that will turn your computer into a botnet zombie,
divorce you from your spouse, chew up your cats, borrow your car without
asking and then sell your house on eBay"
Somehow St recognized me..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike Raiford" <mraXXXiford.at.@g1023mail.com> wrote in message
news:49819503$1@news.povray.org...
> Somehow St recognized me..
Haha, well it wasn't hard... ;)
~Steve~ (The Detective)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> I feel like I should be suspicious of an .exe posted by someone whose name
>> I haven't seen around here before.
>
> Don't be, it's Mike Raiford. (Wrong 'From' name).
Ah, well, in that case- wait, .NET framework?? o_O
OK, maybe not then. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>>> I feel like I should be suspicious of an .exe posted by someone whose
>>> name I haven't seen around here before.
>>
>> Don't be, it's Mike Raiford. (Wrong 'From' name).
>
> Ah, well, in that case- wait, .NET framework?? o_O
>
> OK, maybe not then. :-P
Oh, now c'mon... Do you have the 2.0 framework installed already? I
could probably retarget the project for the 2.0 framework. You'll need
the .NET framework for something eventually anyway. Be it a Silverlight
applet, some useful utility. My FFT toy...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Ah, well, in that case- wait, .NET framework?? o_O
>>
>> OK, maybe not then. :-P
>
> Oh, now c'mon... Do you have the 2.0 framework installed already? I
> could probably retarget the project for the 2.0 framework. You'll need
> the .NET framework for something eventually anyway. Be it a Silverlight
> applet, some useful utility. My FFT toy...
I don't have any .NET components installed at all. And I don't plan on
changing. ;-)
OTOH, if you think that's bad, try convincing Windows users to download
and install the GTK+ runtime so they can run your cool toy. o_O
If only Haskell's libSDL binding would work on Windows... :-(
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> I don't have any .NET components installed at all. And I don't plan on
> changing. ;-)
Why?
> OTOH, if you think that's bad, try convincing Windows users to download
> and install the GTK+ runtime so they can run your cool toy. o_O
>
I'll install GTK+ if you install .NET :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
