POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Ooo... Server Time
6 Sep 2024 21:22:36 EDT (-0400)
  Ooo... (Message 62 to 71 of 111)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 13:18:52
Message: <nb5cn41bcjkj303v2gh8lr85jec3sqhp9u@4ax.com>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 09:46:28 -0800, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:

>Stephen wrote:
>> Well, they just get their 4 year olds to do it. As we all know "My 4 year old
>> can work the VCR better than I can" ;-)
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LLTsSnGWMI#t=5m0s

Nice one Darren :)

My last contract was a support one working in SAP Plant Maintenance. The most
demanding thing I had to do was to show someone how to sort a list in Excel,
face to face without crying. 
-- 

Regards
     Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 13:53:27
Message: <49761da7$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> scott wrote:
>>> Mmm, OK. I didn't think anybody had filmed much in HD yet.
>>
>> I think almost every film has been recorded in HD for many years, if 
>> not decades.  Judging by the number of HD discs available.
> 
> I think it's more like almost every film has been recorded in *film* for 
> many years. Rescanning the film into HD isn't more difficult than 
> scanning it into SD, once you have the equipment.

Yeah, but presumably all that will do is show up the graininess of the 
film in greater detail. It's not like they shoot it in 3500mm film, is it?

PS. The "G" key on my keyboard is dying, and it's *really* starting to 
annoy me...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Raiford
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 14:05:55
Message: <49762093@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:

> 
> Yeah, but presumably all that will do is show up the graininess of the 
> film in greater detail. It's not like they shoot it in 3500mm film, is it?
> 

Akin to seeing a movie on a huge projection screen. Some film has 
exceptionally fine grain.


-- 
~Mike


Post a reply to this message

From: Darren New
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 14:45:35
Message: <497629df$1@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Yeah, but presumably all that will do is show up the graininess of the 
> film in greater detail. It's not like they shoot it in 3500mm film, is it?

Movie theatre film is pretty fine resolution. I think you could easily get 
1920 pixels across the screen. Even the digitally-recorded Star Wars movies 
were something like 1280 or 1024 or so. (Of course, they were tri-color 
pixels, so it's more than a normal megapixel camera would take.)

> PS. The "G" key on my keyboard is dying, and it's *really* starting to 
> annoy me...

Pop the cap and fish out the grunge. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Ouch ouch ouch!"
   "What's wrong? Noodles too hot?"
   "No, I have Chopstick Tunnel Syndrome."


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v8
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 16:03:20
Message: <49763c18$1@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:

> Movie theatre film is pretty fine resolution. I think you could easily 
> get 1920 pixels across the screen. Even the digitally-recorded Star Wars 
> movies were something like 1280 or 1024 or so. (Of course, they were 
> tri-color pixels, so it's more than a normal megapixel camera would take.)

Seriously? I thought it was all recorded in 15mm film...

>> PS. The "G" key on my keyboard is dying, and it's *really* starting to 
>> annoy me...
> 
> Pop the cap and fish out the grunge. :-)

Grunge? Are you kidding me? I've probably worn the metal on the contact 
surface down. ;-)

(I have a laptop that isn't silver any more where my hands rest. And I 
don't even *use* my laptop that much!!)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 18:23:41
Message: <49765cfd$1@news.povray.org>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:33:01 +0100, scott wrote:

>> Yep, we just added the full HD lineup to our cable subscription (which
>> actually *dropped* our monthly charges by $20, go figure).
> 
> Geez how much are you guys paying for TV?!?!

$75/month, no premium channels either.  It was $95/month.

Jim


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:09:56
Message: <497683f4@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> scott wrote:
> 
>> FWIW at our local airport they decided to put a plasma screen above each
>> gate which shows the airline logo, departure time, status etc.  And I
>> guess nobody knew about burn-in, because now you can see "Lufthansa"
>> permanently burnt into the screen no matter what it is displaying.  I
>> see now they show some animated clips or just turn off the displays when
>> they are not in use.
> 
> Ever been to an arcade hall? I swear, every CRT I see has "Insert £1"
> burned into it! ;-)

Ever heard about that guy whose daughter installed a The Little Mermaid
screensaver, and weeks later he finds a "Copyright (c) Disney" burn-in
while working on a spreadsheet? So much for "screen-saving"!


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:11:34
Message: <49768456@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> In the old days, you'd connect the RF arial to the VCR, and another RF
> lead from the VCR to the TV, and tune the TV to a special channel when
> you want to see the signal from the VCR. (I hope it doesn't clash with
> one of your local channels!)

What the hell, my VCR has that, and it's not "old" o_O

I've never seen a SCART connector in my life. It's an european thing as far
as I know.


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:13:50
Message: <497684dd@news.povray.org>
Invisible wrote:
> I still remember how shocked I was when I found out that normal VGA
> actually allows communication in the reverse direction. ;-)

Yeah well, I remember a just-installed Windows XP showing the "new hardware
found" dialog box again and again on its first boot... One of the devices
was the CRT screen, it actually said brand and model... How the HELL does
it know that, and WHY would it want to know that?


Post a reply to this message

From: Nicolas Alvarez
Subject: Re: Ooo...
Date: 20 Jan 2009 21:19:11
Message: <4976861f@news.povray.org>
scott wrote:
> Actually on BBC channels there are no adverts at all, apart from trailers
> for other BBC programs and services.  These usually come in the form of
> 1-3 short trailers *between* each program, never during a program.

Whoa, I wish TV was like that here.

The History Channel breaks every 10 minutes in the middle of the programs,
sometimes advertising products but mostly advertising other programs in the
same channel. And that's cable TV, paying for it. What the hell?


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.