![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Me: I hypothesize that for any small snippet of code posted, at least
one other person will find an alternative way to implement the same
thing - possibly by a radically different method. We should probably
have a name for this...
Other dude: "confusion"?
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Me: I hypothesize that for any small snippet of code posted, at least
> one other person will find an alternative way to implement the same
> thing - possibly by a radically different method. We should probably
> have a name for this...
>
> Other dude: "confusion"?
Guido would probably like that applied to Python (calling it
"confusion", that is).
--
He's got a magnet!!! Everybody BACKUP!!!!!!!!
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawaz org<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Nobody that I know of says that - or, for that matter, anything else at all
involving Haskell.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
somebody wrote:
> Nobody that I know of says that - or, for that matter, anything else at all
> involving Haskell.
Yeah, that's about it really...
Although Haskell does have a reputation as being "for boffins only" -
and boffins have a reputation for not having any humour, so... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 14-Jan-09 17:14, Invisible wrote:
> somebody wrote:
>> Nobody that I know of says that - or, for that matter, anything else
>> at all
>> involving Haskell.
>
> Yeah, that's about it really...
>
> Although Haskell does have a reputation as being "for boffins only" -
> and boffins have a reputation for not having any humour, so... ;-)
Guess where there is a large audience for Adams, Pratchett, Monty Python...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Although Haskell does have a reputation as being "for boffins only" -
>> and boffins have a reputation for not having any humour, so... ;-)
>
> Guess where there is a large audience for Adams, Pratchett, Monty Python...
Hmm... well... Adams seems popular. Pratchett I have literally *no idea*
why anybody would like. And Monty Python is sometimes mildly amusing,
but I don't get the huge fascination...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 15-Jan-09 9:58, Invisible wrote:
>>> Although Haskell does have a reputation as being "for boffins only" -
>>> and boffins have a reputation for not having any humour, so... ;-)
>>
>> Guess where there is a large audience for Adams, Pratchett, Monty
>> Python...
>
> Hmm... well... Adams seems popular. Pratchett I have literally *no idea*
> why anybody would like.
I though you had never read anything by him?
> And Monty Python is sometimes mildly amusing,
> but I don't get the huge fascination...
I do.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Hmm... well... Adams seems popular. Pratchett I have literally *no
>> idea* why anybody would like.
>
> I though you had never read anything by him?
I've spoken to people who have, and none of them liked him. Plus the
articles on Wikipedia make it sound like the guy was on acid when he
wrote this stuff. (The selected quotations are pretty disturbing too...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 15-Jan-09 23:33, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
>>> Hmm... well... Adams seems popular. Pratchett I have literally *no
>>> idea* why anybody would like.
>>
>> I though you had never read anything by him?
>
> I've spoken to people who have, and none of them liked him.
And you have talked to a lot of people that do like him.
> Plus the articles on Wikipedia make it sound like the guy was on acid when he
> wrote this stuff. (The selected quotations are pretty disturbing too...)
It will all make sense in context. Yes, even the orang utan, the turtle,
the death of rats and the genetics that could give rise to Miss Susan.
Besides you are missing a lot of in-jokes here.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'grimsqueaker.jpg' (47 KB)
Preview of image 'grimsqueaker.jpg'
![grimsqueaker.jpg](/povray.off-topic/attachment/%3C496FBF53.7090800%40hotmail.com%3E/grimsqueaker.jpg?ttop=443812&toff=3350&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |