 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-Dec-08 23:01, Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> Ok, that explains the cake. Saw something similar to the thing left in
>> front also, otherwise I still don't get it. Must be my age. ;)
>
> You clearly haven't played Portal. Try it sometimes.
Why?
> It's not even expensive and it's cool.
I have a simple rule of thumb for computer games, if it take more than
an hour and is addictive I don't play it.
> (Will require a PC newer than 5 years, though.)
Good, mine is from 2001.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> I have a simple rule of thumb for computer games, if it take more than
> an hour and is addictive I don't play it.
I try to stick with PC games that save anywhere and can alt-tab out of it.
Ones where you get in the middle of a 10-minute battle aren't too good
either. Stuff like thief or myst work better for me when I'm on the PC. I'm
finding I'm really disliking games where you have to go 15 minutes between
saves, especially if there's a 10 minute easy part and a 5 minute hard part
just before the save.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
The NFL should go international. I'd pay to
see the Detroit Lions vs the Roman Catholics.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
>
> I try to stick with PC games that save anywhere and can alt-tab out of
> it. Ones where you get in the middle of a 10-minute battle aren't too
> good either. Stuff like thief or myst work better for me when I'm on the
> PC. I'm finding I'm really disliking games where you have to go 15
> minutes between saves, especially if there's a 10 minute easy part and a
> 5 minute hard part just before the save.
>
I try to stick with consoles. When I'm playing, I'm playing :). But I'll
have a 3-5 week pause now, 'cause my lamp broke down :/.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
