On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:16:26 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
> 
> That's a Woosh!

Wabbit season. :-)

Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:

http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 24 Mar 2009 16:31:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:16:26 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
>> 
>> That's a Woosh!
>
>Wabbit season. :-)
>

If you say so


>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:

LOL
>
>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
> 
> LOL
>>
>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>

I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the Warner 
Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite Sam 
shows up on the scene.

I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those 
cartoons.  I wish they still ran those classics.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 25 Mar 2009 11:38:04 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
>> 
>> LOL
>>>
>>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>>
>
>I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the Warner 
>Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite Sam 
>shows up on the scene.
>
>I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those 
>cartoons.  I wish they still ran those classics.
>

Although I liked Bugs it is a long time since I've watched any. Not since I was
in my teens and again that was so long ago they were in black and white. ;)

I seem to remember that puppets were more popular here in the UK. Bill and Ben,
Stingray, Four Feather Falls and of course Muffin the Mule :-)

<sings> "We love Muffin, Muffin the mule"
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has 
actually wrapped the header position back around to zero.  I didn't even 
know that was possible.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'long_conversation.png' (48 KB)

Preview of image 'long_conversation.png'

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:31:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 25 Mar 2009 11:38:04 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
>>> 
>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>>>
>>>>
>>I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the
>>Warner Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite
>>Sam shows up on the scene.
>>
>>I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those
>>cartoons.  I wish they still ran those classics.
>>
>>
> Although I liked Bugs it is a long time since I've watched any. Not
> since I was in my teens and again that was so long ago they were in
> black and white. ;)

Well, they were colour here when I watched them, but it also has been a 
long time since I've seen any of the "classic" cartoons.  "What's Opera, 
Doc?" being one of my faves.

> I seem to remember that puppets were more popular here in the UK. Bill
> and Ben, Stingray, Four Feather Falls and of course Muffin the Mule :-)
> 
> <sings> "We love Muffin, Muffin the mule"

LOL

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:

> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero.  I didn't even
> know that was possible.

Wow, I didn't either. :-)

Isn't that one of the reasons this thread started?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> 
>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero.  I didn't even
>> know that was possible.
> 
> Wow, I didn't either. :-)
> 
> Isn't that one of the reasons this thread started?

I suppose so.  Now I mostly wonder by what factor this is the longest 
p.o.t thread ever.

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler <wam### [at] uwashingtonedu>
wrote:

>This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has 
>actually wrapped the header position back around to zero.  I didn't even 
>know that was possible.

Is that a hint?
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On 25 Mar 2009 18:04:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Well, they were colour here when I watched them, but it also has been a 
>long time since I've seen any of the "classic" cartoons.  "What's Opera, 
>Doc?" being one of my faves.

It was probably my eyes that were in B&W then ;)

I particularly disliked the Yosemite Sam episodes preferring Daffy Duck.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message