|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:15:25 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2009 12:05:36 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>> Mug's away, mug's game is something different.
>>
>>Ah, right - right thought, wrong terminology. :-)
>>
>>
> I thought so :)
That's my story and I'm sticking to it. ;-)
>>> Anyway I thought that the game had reached its natural conclusion and
>>> would return later for a new series.
>>
>>Fair enough, I can save it for later. :-)
>>
>>Duck season! ;-)
>
> Only if it is crispy aromatic duck <Yum yum>
Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
That's a Woosh!
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:16:26 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
>
> That's a Woosh!
Wabbit season. :-)
Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 24 Mar 2009 16:31:54 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:16:26 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 24 Mar 2009 13:03:48 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Well, then, it must be hassenfefer. ;-)
>>
>> That's a Woosh!
>
>Wabbit season. :-)
>
If you say so
>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
LOL
>
>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
>
> LOL
>>
>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>
I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the Warner
Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite Sam
shows up on the scene.
I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those
cartoons. I wish they still ran those classics.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25 Mar 2009 11:38:04 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
>>
>> LOL
>>>
>>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>>
>
>I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the Warner
>Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite Sam
>shows up on the scene.
>
>I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those
>cartoons. I wish they still ran those classics.
>
Although I liked Bugs it is a long time since I've watched any. Not since I was
in my teens and again that was so long ago they were in black and white. ;)
I seem to remember that puppets were more popular here in the UK. Bill and Ben,
Stingray, Four Feather Falls and of course Muffin the Mule :-)
<sings> "We love Muffin, Muffin the mule"
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't even
know that was possible.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'long_conversation.png' (48 KB)
Preview of image 'long_conversation.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:31:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2009 11:38:04 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:50:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>>Probably would've helped if I'd spelt it correctly:
>>>
>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>>http://www.fabulousfoods.com/recipes/article/134/27929
>>>>
>>>>
>>I kinda figured you'd be familiar with it, being familiar with the
>>Warner Bros. cartoons - the dish comes up quite frequently when Yosemite
>>Sam shows up on the scene.
>>
>>I spent probably far, far too much time as a kid watching those
>>cartoons. I wish they still ran those classics.
>>
>>
> Although I liked Bugs it is a long time since I've watched any. Not
> since I was in my teens and again that was so long ago they were in
> black and white. ;)
Well, they were colour here when I watched them, but it also has been a
long time since I've seen any of the "classic" cartoons. "What's Opera,
Doc?" being one of my faves.
> I seem to remember that puppets were more popular here in the UK. Bill
> and Ben, Stingray, Four Feather Falls and of course Muffin the Mule :-)
>
> <sings> "We love Muffin, Muffin the mule"
LOL
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:
> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't even
> know that was possible.
Wow, I didn't either. :-)
Isn't that one of the reasons this thread started?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:13:42 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>
>> This conversation has been going on so long that Thunderbird has
>> actually wrapped the header position back around to zero. I didn't even
>> know that was possible.
>
> Wow, I didn't either. :-)
>
> Isn't that one of the reasons this thread started?
I suppose so. Now I mostly wonder by what factor this is the longest
p.o.t thread ever.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |