On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:28:18 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 15 Mar 2009 13:15:22 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:08:05 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 13 Mar 2009 18:20:31 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>>> Wabbit season Jim but not as we know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's the end of the world as we know it......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Duck season!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Wa Wa Wa Wabbits!
>>>>
>>>>Du du du du DUCKS! :-)
>>> 
>>> You win, it's Duck season. What would I know about it anyway? I think
>>> killing things for fun is immoral even if they are only 2D :)
>>
>>But it's Wabbit season! :-)
>>
>>
> Ah! you were just bending your knees sharply :)

Well, I do occasionally have muscle spasms that cause that - seems that 
my muscles have gotten used to exercise, and when I don't, they remind me.

>>(And I don't disagree with you on your final comment)
>>
>>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
> 
> Just for you :)

And every other reader of that page. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>> 
>> Just for you :)
>
>And every other reader of that page. :-)

Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>> 
>>> Just for you :)
>>
>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
> 
> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)

Lost for words?  :-)

Did note the date - are they doing new ones?

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 17:26:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>>> 
>>>> Just for you :)
>>>
>>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
>> 
>> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
>
>Lost for words?  :-)
>
>Did note the date - are they doing new ones?
>

No, no, no. Note today's date because I'm lost for words and it doesn't happen
very often.

I don't know, they did series in 2002, 2006 and 2007.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamish_and_Dougal

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:24:36 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 16 Mar 2009 17:26:10 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:17:39 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 15 Mar 2009 16:25:45 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007jzy5
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just for you :)
>>>>
>>>>And every other reader of that page. :-)
>>> 
>>> Note the date. I'm lost for words. :)
>>
>>Lost for words?  :-)
>>
>>Did note the date - are they doing new ones?
>>
>>
> No, no, no. Note today's date because I'm lost for words and it doesn't
> happen very often.

Ah, well, that at least in my experience is certainly true.


> I don't know, they did series in 2002, 2006 and 2007.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamish_and_Dougal

Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series 
either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)

Marble Arch.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series 
>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>

I've only heard a couple, myself

>Marble Arch.

Oh! No you don't!
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:00:03 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series
>>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>>
>>
> I've only heard a couple, myself

Time to start searching, methinks. :-)

>>Marble Arch.
> 
> Oh! No you don't!

I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next 
round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured 
let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 16 Mar 2009 22:11:11 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:00:03 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 16 Mar 2009 18:37:34 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Yeah, that's what I knew about.  But I haven't heard any of those series
>>>either so even if it was a repeat, it's still new to us. :-)
>>>
>>>
>> I've only heard a couple, myself
>
>Time to start searching, methinks. :-)
>
A starting point, maybe

http://tinyurl.com/d75bx6

>>>Marble Arch.
>> 
>> Oh! No you don't!
>
>I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next 
>round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured 
>let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back. :-)
>
I think that the teams are too small and we need an adjudicator.
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:49:09 +0000, Stephen wrote:

>>Time to start searching, methinks. :-)
>>
> A starting point, maybe
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/d75bx6

:-)

>>>>Marble Arch.
>>> 
>>> Oh! No you don't!
>>
>>I think rule 47(a) says that the winner is permitted to start the next
>>round - and I'm already in hoc to you for a bought round, so I figured
>>let's give it another go and see if I can earn that bought round back.
>>:-)
>>
> I think that the teams are too small and we need an adjudicator.

Well, the teams aren't too small, because we had 2+ months of a game with 
teams the way we are now....But I'll call in an adjudicator, one 
moment. :-)

OK, adjudication is in......

I am permitted to start this round, but my next move has to be to 
Bayswater.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On 17 Mar 2009 15:42:21 -0400, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>Well, the teams aren't too small, because we had 2+ months of a game with 
>teams the way we are now....But I'll call in an adjudicator, one 
>moment. :-)
>
>OK, adjudication is in......
>
>I am permitted to start this round, but my next move has to be to 
>Bayswater.

You can't fool me, your lips moved. We need an independent adjudicator.

If you are at Bayswater then I will meet you in the Redan at the top of
Queensway.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message