|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> Money is an imaginary concept anyway.
No it's not. It's only fiat money that's imaginary.
> Do you really think that you
> physically have all the money in your bank account?
No. Indeed, I don't even have the "money" that's in my wallet in the
terms of green pieces of paper.
> so what's the
> difference between the 1% of your net worth you carry with you being
> cash versus some form of electronic payment?
That I can actually have as much of my net worth I want in the form of
anonymous untraceable bits of paper I can use to buy stuff with?
Say you're the wife of an abusive police officer. Wouldn't it be nice to
be able to hire a cab and buy a bus ticket without your abusive
homicidal husband being able to ask the bank where it is you're hiding?
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Ever notice how people in a zombie movie never already know how to
kill zombies? Ask 100 random people in America how to kill someone
who has reanimated from the dead in a secret viral weapons lab,
and how many do you think already know you need a head-shot?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> number in *several* computers, thanks to redundancy :) ), so what's the
> difference between the 1% of your net worth you carry with you being
> cash versus some form of electronic payment?
>
The differences are several I think.
There is not what amounts to a tax on commerce going straight into
financial institution coffers, if two people use cash as an interface.
There is with electronic, and if all money were electronic this would
amount to a tax from the 'bank' on all existing commerce. Further,
there would be little cost to adding tax apon tax apon tax. Tax money
for everybody with influence. Whoopee if you're one of them.
But if you are of the underclass, the demi-monde. You bear the burden.
Also, if you have little access to the establishment, if you are 'other'
and deemed undesireable, and cannot access the official mediums for
money exchange, without cash the sanctions against you would be even
more severe. With the availability of currency, those forced to inhabit
this shadow world could carry %100 of their 'net worth' as cash.
With solely electronic money, the ability for those in power to monitor
people is enhanced tremendously as was already mentioned, and along with
such control comes the ability to sanction others.
Now, there will always be a blackmarket and barter will always be used
to circumvent this because such a homogeous world as is implicit in the
vision of a cashless world can never exist.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> "Mueen Nawaz" <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote in message
> news:489b20cd$1@news.povray.org...
>
>> I now try to use the CC for online-only transactions. There was a long
>> while where I just kept it at home. I try to pay whatever I can in cash
>> now. Not to save money, but I got wary of various companies knowing my
>> shopping habits.
>
>
> That's exactly what I do. I hope they never get rid of cash, to me, it's
> the most important thing in life, (as far as paying something goes). I
> wouldn't feel safe if there wasn't any hard cash to use.
>
>> Paranoia, as Sabrina said.
>
> Yes, that's it.
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
I hope neither of you are using those 'customer benefit' cards that
everyone hands out. Or, at the least, carry 8 of them for the same store
with different invalid addresses under fake names.
And I wonder why my key chain gets heavy . . .
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> Same thing with the majority of utility bills - the invoice comes
>> through and the payment drawn a few days later.
>
> While handy, it hasn't been available in the USA long enough for me to
> trust it to work reliably. :-) It only took them about 5 or 10 years
> before direct deposit failed to suck. No way am I letting them take it
> *out* without my interaction.
>
I have to agree. Besides, I find it much simpler to know that you always
have to manage that withdrawal of money at a certain time, rather then
remembering to do it the one time you charge too much. And the late fees
on a credit card are normally much kinder then the overdraft fees from
the bank.
The only time I've seen automated utility payment done right, was when
it automatically billed a credit card. Cash back bonus, ding the utility
company for the service fee, and have that extra month to pay it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:21:25 -0700, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>
>Say you're the wife of an abusive police officer. Wouldn't it be nice to
>be able to hire a cab and buy a bus ticket without your abusive
>homicidal husband being able to ask the bank where it is you're hiding?
There is also "skimming" to take into account.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skimming_%28credit_card_fraud%29#Skimming
Cash is anonymous and safe to use. Also it is quicker to get the transaction
through a till if the shop is using a dial up connection.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> There is also "skimming" to take into account.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skimming_%28credit_card_fraud%29#Skimming
> Cash is anonymous and safe to use. Also it is quicker to get the transaction
> through a till if the shop is using a dial up connection.
Yeah the speed/convenience does depend on circumstance. For instance it
cuts two ways with me. At the gas pump the card is faster and more
convenient than having to walk some cash over to the bullet-proof booth,
maybe wait in a line, overpay, then walk back, pump the gas, then back
over to the cashier to get any change. But in the taxi, waiting for a
customer to pay with a card slows things way down. Utterly frustrating
to loose a fare to another cab because you can't get your current people
out of the car fast enough. And then of course there is the wait to get
your receipts from the dispatcher at the end of the shift.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 08:30:20 -0400, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
>Yeah the speed/convenience does depend on circumstance. For instance it
>cuts two ways with me. At the gas pump the card is faster and more
>convenient than having to walk some cash over to the bullet-proof booth,
>maybe wait in a line, overpay, then walk back, pump the gas, then back
>over to the cashier to get any change. But in the taxi, waiting for a
>customer to pay with a card slows things way down. Utterly frustrating
>to loose a fare to another cab because you can't get your current people
>out of the car fast enough. And then of course there is the wait to get
>your receipts from the dispatcher at the end of the shift.
Here we still fill up with fuel then pay. Some places do have card facilities at
the pumps though. "Pre-pay", it is a terrible world :(
My pet peeve is people who pay for "small change" shopping with a card. But then
I'm getting old and cantankerous ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Here we still fill up with fuel then pay. Some places do have card facilities at
> the pumps though. "Pre-pay", it is a terrible world :(
Sadly, one pump-and-run can take the profit of an entire week from the
gas station.
> My pet peeve is people who pay for "small change" shopping with a card. But then
> I'm getting old and cantankerous ;)
I get annoyed at people who pay with a personal check for that sort of
stuff, myself. Altho I understand that's usually not their own fault.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Ever notice how people in a zombie movie never already know how to
kill zombies? Ask 100 random people in America how to kill someone
who has reanimated from the dead in a secret viral weapons lab,
and how many do you think already know you need a head-shot?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> I hope neither of you are using those 'customer benefit' cards that
> everyone hands out. Or, at the least, carry 8 of them for the same store
> with different invalid addresses under fake names.
Valid point. I have one for one store. I've always felt like getting
another one with a fake address. Then I felt that would just be plain
dishonest. Then I end up deciding to just shop elsewhere.
--
When a toast with butter falls from your hand, it always falls on the
butter side.
When a cat falls from a height, it always lands on her feet.
If you tie a buttertoast over a cat with the butterside to the top, and
let both fall, what will face the floor, the butter or the feet?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Sabrina Kilian" <"ykgp at vtSPAM.edu"> wrote in message
news:489e857d$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> "Mueen Nawaz" <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote in message
> I hope neither of you are using those 'customer benefit' cards that
> everyone hands out. Or, at the least, carry 8 of them for the same store
> with different invalid addresses under fake names.
Noooo thank you. :) Heard enough horror stories about them.
>
> And I wonder why my key chain gets heavy . . .
Why does it get heavy?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |