 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> That the people writing the *paper* didn't write it in a convincing way
> doesn't really say much about the *code*.
True. But given that it seems to be a one man project... Well I'm sure
it *works*, but that's not the same as being secure. [Not that any sane
person is going to bother trying to hack my systems unless it's
sufficiently easy.]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> True. But given that it seems to be a one man project...
I see. I hadn't followed it up. No, if the author of the code is the
author of the paper, I'd definitely go with IPSEC. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> True. But given that it seems to be a one man project...
>
> I see. I hadn't followed it up. No, if the author of the code is the
> author of the paper, I'd definitely go with IPSEC. :-)
It appears the report was written by somebody other than the author. But
then, comments like "OpenVPN seems to be using SSL" make me suspicious.
As does the fact that SSL and TLS both run over TCP, yet OpenVPN seems
to be using UPD. That looks like a big enough deviation from the
standard that I'm left wondering how many design decisions have been
made with potential security implications.
It's not like OpenVPN just calls the OpenSSH crypto library to do its
bidding; it looks like a complete new implementation.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 09:08:07 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> It appears the report was written by somebody other than the author.
That sentence made me laugh. Of course, it's 3 AM here (almost 3:30), so
I'm a little sleepy, but can I just say THANK YOU? I *really* needed a
laugh.
Tough night, and this really helped.
Thank you.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> That sentence made me laugh. Of course, it's 3 AM here (almost 3:30), so
> I'm a little sleepy, but can I just say THANK YOU? I *really* needed a
> laugh.
>
> Tough night, and this really helped.
>
> Thank you.
No problem. There's no charge for this service. Please contact Phil Cook
in my absence. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:24:57 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> That sentence made me laugh. Of course, it's 3 AM here (almost 3:30),
>> so I'm a little sleepy, but can I just say THANK YOU? I *really*
>> needed a laugh.
>>
>> Tough night, and this really helped.
>>
>> Thank you.
>
> No problem. There's no charge for this service. Please contact Phil Cook
> in my absence. ;-)
And another laugh. I might actually get some sleep yet tonight. :-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> No problem. There's no charge for this service. Please contact Phil Cook
>> in my absence. ;-)
>
> And another laugh. I might actually get some sleep yet tonight. :-)
Yeah - dude, what the hell?? WHY ARE YOU AWAKE?! x_x
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:27:26 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> No problem. There's no charge for this service. Please contact Phil
>>> Cook in my absence. ;-)
>>
>> And another laugh. I might actually get some sleep yet tonight. :-)
>
> Yeah - dude, what the hell?? WHY ARE YOU AWAKE?! x_x
Right now because I'm talking to you. 5 AM now.
Today's the 4th of July here, so I don't have to work today.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Yeah - dude, what the hell?? WHY ARE YOU AWAKE?! x_x
>
> Right now because I'm talking to you. 5 AM now.
>
> Today's the 4th of July here, so I don't have to work today.
Ooo, Independence Day. This can mean only one thing...
...it's Jamie's birthday tomorrow! :-D
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:06:46 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> Yeah - dude, what the hell?? WHY ARE YOU AWAKE?! x_x
>>
>> Right now because I'm talking to you. 5 AM now.
>>
>> Today's the 4th of July here, so I don't have to work today.
>
> Ooo, Independence Day. This can mean only one thing...
>
> ...it's Jamie's birthday tomorrow! :-D
Which Jamie?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
