|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Mueen Nawaz wrote:
>> We were told that in British English, when writing out lists like
>> the above, there should never be a comma before "and". I also hear
>> that this rule is rarely taught anymore...
>
> My understanding is in that case the comma is optional. (I always put it
> there, because I'm a nerd.) It's required when you have multiple
I guess I wasn't clear. What I was taught was that it's optional,
unless it's British English where it's wrong.
--
If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?
/\ /\ /\ /
/ \/ \ u e e n / \/ a w a z
>>>>>>mue### [at] nawazorg<<<<<<
anl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:57:34 -0500, Mueen Nawaz <m.n### [at] ieeeorg>
wrote:
>Warp wrote:
>>> All three of these aren't correct.
>>
>> Btw, wouldn't it be better to say "none of these three are correct"?
>
> Nope.
>
> It would be better to say "none of these three *is* correct".
>
> </nitpick>
I don't think it would. Is is singular, are is plural, we are talking
about three. ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:36:59 +0100, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> did
spake, saying:
> I have to admit I have no idea if this contraction is wrong or
> acceptable.
> It *sounds* wrong to me, but how should I know? The answer to this is
> also something just impossible to find with google:
>
> "The rest of it is not difficult." -> "The rest of it's not difficult."
As has been discussed "it isn't" would probably be the default contraction
(regional variants notwithstanding), however "it's not" would be more
likely used when you what to emphasize the ease of 'it'.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:34:06 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom>
did spake, saying:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:57:34 -0500, Mueen Nawaz <m.n### [at] ieeeorg>
> wrote:
>
>> Warp wrote:
>>>> All three of these aren't correct.
>>>
>>> Btw, wouldn't it be better to say "none of these three are correct"?
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>> It would be better to say "none of these three *is* correct".
>>
>> </nitpick>
>
> I don't think it would. Is is singular, are is plural, we are talking
> about three. ;)
Ah but is 'none' singular? Try "I think it is none of these three" vs. "I
think it are none of these three" :-P
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:00:29 +0100, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
>Ah but is 'none' singular? Try "I think it is none of these three" vs. "I
>think it are none of these three" :-P
>
I'm not one to argue but if you replace "none" with "not one" you get;
So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
>
...also put today's date ;-)
btw, today's dare is what?
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:30:43 +0100, Doctor John
<doc### [at] gmailcom> did spake, saying:
> Stephen wrote:
>> So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
>>
> ...also put today's date ;-)
>
> btw, today's dare is what?
With the hot weather it must be sticking your tongue in a desk fan :-P
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:30:43 +0100, Doctor John
> <doc### [at] gmailcom> did spake, saying:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>> So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
>>>
>> ...also put today's date ;-)
>>
>> btw, today's dare is what?
>
> With the hot weather it must be sticking your tongue in a desk fan :-P
>
Just done it. Blood everywhere ;-) Now what?
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:36:21 +0100, Doctor John
<doc### [at] gmailcom> did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> And lo on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:30:43 +0100, Doctor John
>> <doc### [at] gmailcom> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>> So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
>>>>
>>> ...also put today's date ;-)
>>>
>>> btw, today's dare is what?
>>
>> With the hot weather it must be sticking your tongue in a desk fan :-P
>>
> Just done it. Blood everywhere ;-) Now what?
You win, go collect your prize at the A&E.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:30:43 +0100, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom>
wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> So I am wrong. Put today's dare in your diary :)
>>
>...also put today's date ;-)
>
>btw, today's dare is what?
I hate M$ autocorrect
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |