 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> stbenge wrote:
>
>> Of course if I were programming for a living, I would probably go to
>> school where they would teach me how to write code that people could
>> decipher :)
>
> Don't count on it! ;-)
I should take *some* C++ courses, considering my near-total confusion
when trying to use Irrlicht recently... I'm pretty much clueless when it
comes to classes and such.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:26:58 +0300, Eero Ahonen
<aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
>Warp wrote:
>>
>> I disagree.
>>
>
>Good, 'cause you're wrong.
I can't help but agree with you.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:56:40 +0100, Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull>
wrote:
What happened to you? I thought that you were coming for a drink
tonight?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Halbert wrote:
>
> Why doesn't the rest of the world understand that?
>
But they do understand. Each in his own way.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm a rebel I use both ways and other ways.
If the 'if' condition is short I put it all line.
if it's a little longer maybe the line below
Readable is minor compared to the total lack of documentation people use
in their C and c++ programs.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I, for one, find it much easier to read C++ code which is braced like
> this:
Me too, that's how I code and how I code in POV too. I think it looks much
nicer spaced out like that, I think of the braces as a way to force a line
of white-space (apart from the brace character, obviously) above and below
blocks of code.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> What happened to you? I thought that you were coming for a drink
> tonight?
Oh.
I thought I said I'd check whether I'm available and get back to you?
[Which admittedly I never did...]
Turns out I had to move furnature around instead. Sorry about that...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:06:14 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> What happened to you? I thought that you were coming for a drink
>> tonight?
>
>Oh.
>
>I thought I said I'd check whether I'm available and get back to you?
>[Which admittedly I never did...]
>
>Turns out I had to move furnature around instead. Sorry about that...
Good job we waited in the pub ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Oh.
>>
>> I thought I said I'd check whether I'm available and get back to you?
>> [Which admittedly I never did...]
>>
>> Turns out I had to move furnature around instead. Sorry about that...
>
> Good job we waited in the pub ;)
Oh well - I hope you lot enjoyed yourselves even if I didn't. Heh. ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
[...]
> Whereas I find the first far too spread out to be able to read easily and
> use the second as my standard code layout in C-like languages
Heh, that reminds me... Some guy actually wrote code like this:
if (DoNot == 0)
{
DoThis = true;
} else {
DoThis = false;
}
This was a few years back and on old university monitors, so he didn't
actually have much more than 10 commands TOTAL on screen at any given
time. How you keep an overview over the entire algorithm in that manner
is lost on me, and obviously on him, too: he didn't get his code working
in three weeks.
Regards,
Tim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
