 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7465115.stm
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7465115.stm
128 bytes of RAM in 1948.
30 years later the popular Atari 2600 was published, which had a whopping
amount of 128 bytes of RAM.
Not much of an improvement, I would say. :P
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> 128 bytes of RAM in 1948.
>
> 30 years later the popular Atari 2600 was published, which had a whopping
> amount of 128 bytes of RAM.
>
> Not much of an improvement, I would say. :P
Size and Wattage difference, much? ;-)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7465115.stm
>
> 128 bytes of RAM in 1948.
That included the program space.
> 30 years later the popular Atari 2600 was published, which had a whopping
> amount of 128 bytes of RAM.
No, it had >4K of RAM. It was just ROM RAM.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Helpful housekeeping hints:
Check your feather pillows for holes
before putting them in the washing machine.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible, do you actually USE POV-Ray for anything, or do you just come here to
stimulate our minds and torment us? Just curious...
I'd like to see some artwork of some sort :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Robert McGregor wrote:
> Invisible, do you actually USE POV-Ray for anything, or do you just come here to
> stimulate our minds and torment us? Just curious...
>
> I'd like to see some artwork of some sort :)
*checks*
Right. At this time, I do not actually have POV-Ray installed on this
PC. (I recently reinstalled Windoze. There's a bunch of things I haven't
put back yet.)
Most of my renderings are lame anyway. Have a wander through the IRTC
and see if you can ring "slush candle" (or was it "ice candle"?) You'll
see what I mean.
OTOH, I could enjoy rendering some more isosurfaces sometime soon...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Most of my renderings are lame anyway. Have a wander through the IRTC
> and see if you can ring "slush candle" (or was it "ice candle"?) You'll
> see what I mean.
Oh yeah, "Slush Candle" - I just looked it up and it's not lame. Now I remember
seeing it before - the "Fire and Ice" round; surprisingly I took first place
that round, even beating out the mighty Tek.
:)
"There is no spoon."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Robert McGregor wrote:
> Invisible, do you actually USE POV-Ray for anything, or do you just come here to
> stimulate our minds and torment us? Just curious...
>
> I'd like to see some artwork of some sort :)
>
We need to start a support group for POV-Ray addicts who don't seem to
use POV-Ray much...
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chambers wrote:
> We need to start a support group for POV-Ray addicts who don't seem to
> use POV-Ray much...
...and what the heck is the off-topic group for??
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:15:31 -0700, Darren New wrote:
> No, it had >4K of RAM. It was just ROM RAM.
What's that?
--
Joel Yliluoma - http://iki.fi/bisqwit/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
