|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 30 Apr 2008 10:05:58
Message: <48187cc6@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Which also reminded me of these:
>
> http://sam.zoy.org/porn/cute_underage_chick_with_hairy_pussy.jpeg
Awww, cute!
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:11:07 +0100, Sabrina Kilian
<ykg### [at] SUCKSvtedu> did spake, saying:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:09:59 -0400, John VanSickle wrote:
>
>> Doctor John wrote:
>>> Watching a trailer for 'Ironman' last night, I noticed the warning
>>> "Contains strong violence and one use of moderate language".
Oh no one of the characters probably gets beaten to a pulp and then says
"Shit that hurt"... gotta warn the parents about that type of language.
>> They probably intended to say "mature" or "immoderate," spelled it
>> wrong, and the spell checker changed it to "moderate."
>
> I think it is shortened from 'moderately offensive' language. Who ever
> shortened it just didn't pay attention to the new meaning of the
> sentence.
Or possibly derived from Strong Language, so you also get Mild Language
and Moderate Language; like cheese :-)
I have yet to see anything that warns me it contains "Language", but I
suppose it's only a matter of time.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 10:58:38
Message: <481b2c1e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> I have yet to see anything that warns me it contains "Language", but I
> suppose it's only a matter of time.
'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 11:11:50
Message: <481b2f36$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> 'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
Indeed...
"WATCH The Day After Tomorrow. IN CINEMAS NOW! [Contains mild peril.]"
Uh, no... no, actually the entire film *is* mild peril. It does not
merely "contain" it. :-P
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 02 May 2008 16:01:16 +0100, Bill Pragnell
<bil### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>> I have yet to see anything that warns me it contains "Language", but I
>> suppose it's only a matter of time.
>
> 'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
Ah mild peril - [solo]How could you serve - [chorus]Mustard.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 02 May 2008 16:11:33 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake, saying:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
>
>> 'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
>
> Indeed...
>
> "WATCH The Day After Tomorrow. IN CINEMAS NOW! [Contains mild peril.]"
'No don't go into down that crevasse - there might be a crazed wolf down
there, or you might slip and find yourself hanging over a 1000ft drop'
'No way this movie only contains mild peril'
'Oh! Hey go ahead then, if you want me I'll be in the woods kicking bears'
> Uh, no... no, actually the entire film *is* mild peril. It does not
> merely "contain" it. :-P
I've seen this film, I know I've seen this film; so why is it I can't
remember a single thing about it other the fact I've seen it?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Invisible
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 11:40:30
Message: <481b35ee@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> I've seen this film, I know I've seen this film; so why is it I can't
> remember a single thing about it other the fact I've seen it?
...because it's diabolically shallow and pointless? (Not to mention
laughably implausible.)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jim Henderson
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 11:49:24
Message: <481b3804$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 02 May 2008 16:40:08 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Phil Cook wrote:
>
>> I've seen this film, I know I've seen this film; so why is it I can't
>> remember a single thing about it other the fact I've seen it?
>
> ...because it's diabolically shallow and pointless? (Not to mention
> laughably implausible.)
Well, if there are crevasses, then there are bound to be points
somewhere. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill Pragnell
Subject: Re: Distortion of meaning? - contains one use of moderate language
Date: 2 May 2008 12:01:27
Message: <481b3ad7$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
>
>> 'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
>
> Indeed...
>
> "WATCH The Day After Tomorrow. IN CINEMAS NOW! [Contains mild peril.]"
I think I first saw it on the DVD jacket for 'Ice Age'.
Language: none
Sex/nudity: none
Violence: none
Other: contains mild peril
Brilliant.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo on Fri, 02 May 2008 17:04:04 +0100, Bill Pragnell
<bil### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
> Invisible wrote:
>> Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>
>>> 'Mild Peril' always makes me chuckle.
>> Indeed...
>> "WATCH The Day After Tomorrow. IN CINEMAS NOW! [Contains mild peril.]"
>
> I think I first saw it on the DVD jacket for 'Ice Age'.
>
> Language: none
Ice Age was a silent movie?
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |