|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> Invisible wrote:
>>
>> People get kinda annoyed if you do stuff to the server they're trying
>> to use...
>
> That's why there are times called "service windows". On a service window
> people are *not* using the server so you can do stuff on it.
I doubt anybody is going to pay overtime so I can remove a couple of
items from the recycle bin.
>> I believe you can find this information from the "server" applet from
>> the control panel.
>>
>> Nope, wait, that's only for Windows NT. They removed it in Windows XP.
>> Hold on... Ah yes, Computer Management. There's a "Shared Folders"
>> item in the right pane, with an "Open Files" subitem.
>
> I'm not actually sure if that subitem tells you everything, but have you
> checked there? Of course, you should check it form the server, not your
> workstation (I surely hope your servers are not running XP).
This particular server is running Windows 2000 Server, which has the
same Control Panel layout.
>> Alternatively, either PS Tools or Process Explorer from System
>> Internals might help you. [Altough given that M$ now ownes that, maybe
>> not...]
>
> Possibly. Go and find out, who's (ab)using your recycle bins ;).
Well, these folders are managed by our automated project ****-up system,
so I imagine that's probably the source of the trouble...
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
>
> I doubt anybody is going to pay overtime so I can remove a couple of
> items from the recycle bin.
>
Don't doubt it - ask for it. If not allowed, at least you'll know
service windows are not considered needed, which means the servers can
be maintained during work ours (you should explain this while asking for
service windows).
> This particular server is running Windows 2000 Server, which has the
> same Control Panel layout.
I assumed so :).
> Well, these folders are managed by our automated project ****-up system,
> so I imagine that's probably the source of the trouble...
Sound very possible.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Invisible wrote:
>> Alternatively, either PS Tools or Process Explorer from System
>> Internals might help you. [Altough given that M$ now ownes that, maybe
>> not...]
>
> Possibly. Go and find out, who's (ab)using your recycle bins ;).
>
And not only find out, you can also force the file handle closed and
delete the files. But there is a high chance of having the owning
process crash if it tries to do something with that file handle it
thought was open...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen wrote:
> You're slowly getting enough Linux -oriented to get Windows jamming as
> others of us have gotten for years ;).
Well, this is the first time I've tried to do something really
system-level in Windows. And I no longer have a working C compiler
installed under Windows (using all interpreters/VMs), so I can't put in
the exact calls I need.
MS doesn't exactly make the baroque stuff easy to find on their web
site, either - especially when they're trying to push you to use the new
stuff. :-)
I've always had minor annoyances with Windows, and never said Linux was
bad as such. Never disputed that. They're just *different* annoyances
than with Linux. :-)
It's like arguing over whether compiled or interpreted code is "better".
Meaningless unless you talk about specific situations.
>> I guess something had the drive locked or some such, and I wasn't
>> getting back particularly informative error messages?
>
> Actually, that's probably a lot better reason.
Except it didn't work when booting off a liveCD, so I can't imagine
what's locking drives at that level.
>> Oh well, I guess I'll see if it works where I really want it to work.
>
> Note that if it's about locking oslt, you can't be sure that it'll work
> always when needed :(.
It would probably work reliably if I actually had a compiler so I could
make the right calls. :-) It's not enough of a hassle yet to actually
find and download a free windows compiler. Yet.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> You think that's random? On one of our servers, there are some folders
> in the recycle bin which *cannot* be deleted. Every time you try it
> complains that they're "in use".
They're probably not really in use. :-)
In addition to the advice already given (safe mode, etc) there are also
utilities that will set up entries in the registry that will make the
boot process rename or delete the file before anything else starts
<http://lifehacker.com/software/how-to/delete-a-locked-file-in-windows-266433.php>
or you can boot a liveCD (google "bartPE") so you're not booting the
server system at all.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> It would probably work reliably if I actually had a compiler so I could
> make the right calls. :-) It's not enough of a hassle yet to actually
> find and download a free windows compiler. Yet.
I used these instructions:
http://arrozcru.no-ip.org/ffmpeg_wiki/tiki-index.php?page=MSys_MinGW
You could also get cygwin, which is probably easier to set up.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> I used these instructions:
> http://arrozcru.no-ip.org/ffmpeg_wiki/tiki-index.php?page=MSys_MinGW
Thank you!
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible schrieb:
> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>
>>> Oh well, I guess I'll see if it works where I really want it to work.
>>
>> Note that if it's about locking oslt, you can't be sure that it'll
>> work always when needed :(.
>
> You think that's random? On one of our servers, there are some folders
> in the recycle bin which *cannot* be deleted. Every time you try it
> complains that they're "in use". Despite the fact that the server has
> been rebooted God knows how many times over the years. But still these
> files cannot be removed.
>
http://ccollomb.free.fr/unlocker/
Using this tool at least once a week
kk
> Fortunately they're small...
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> whatever it is, if there is such a thing it may be hidden behind a button
> somewhere... ;)
>
>
It got lost between the 'z' and the 'windows' key
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Darren New wrote:
> Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> You're slowly getting enough Linux -oriented to get Windows jamming as
>> others of us have gotten for years ;).
>
-clip-
> I've always had minor annoyances with Windows, and never said Linux was
> bad as such. Never disputed that. They're just *different* annoyances
> than with Linux. :-)
Yep. Now I have to make sure you did notice the smiley on my text ;).
You just seem to have a bad habit to find out mysterious things from
Windows - the ones listed as missing options etc...
>> Actually, that's probably a lot better reason.
>
> Except it didn't work when booting off a liveCD, so I can't imagine
> what's locking drives at that level.
Agh, then it's surely something else. Go figure...
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |