 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:56:35 +0000, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>
>> If you don't know what an RFC is, tough ;-)
>
> Remote Function Call?
>
> Regards
> Stephen
I trust that was irony
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott <sco### [at] laptopcom> wrote:
> > And if in the typical top-posting style the quote below is 50 pages long,
> > they can easily find the single line to which this poster is replying to.
> I don't know any emails we have here that are 50 pages long. If it's longer
> than a paragraph or two it's usually too importnant for an email and better
> explained and archived in a word or powerpoint document.
Not one single email, but the email plus the 100 previous emails which
are being bottom-quoted in the single email.
> But that is a minor occurance compared to everyone else who reads every
> email. Why force everyone else to follow an awkward process for every
> email, just so that Bob can read the history in top-to-bottom order, should
> he wish to do so?
Awkward? How hard is it to press the "end" key in the keyboard?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:11:53 +0000, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Remote Function Call?
>>
>
>I trust that was irony
Actually RFCnnnn (Remote Function Call nnnn) are used extensively in my job so
it is the first thing that came to mind. :)
The second thing was to Google it but that's not funny and I live near Andrew
(It must be catching) :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:11:53 +0000, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
>> Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> Remote Function Call?
>>>
>> I trust that was irony
>
> Never put your trust in …
>
> Actually RFCnnnn (Remote Function Call nnnn) are used extensively in my job so
> it is the first thing that came to mind. :)
> The second thing was to Google it but that's not funny and I live near Andrew
> (It must be catching) :)
Ok, then, Request For Comments (Internet Standards mean anything? :-)
John
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:34:21 +0000, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>Ok, then, Request For Comments (Internet Standards mean anything? :-)
It does now :)
But RTS/CTS means more to me :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> But that is a minor occurance compared to everyone else who reads every
>> email. Why force everyone else to follow an awkward process for every
>> email, just so that Bob can read the history in top-to-bottom order,
>> should
>> he wish to do so?
>
> Awkward? How hard is it to press the "end" key in the keyboard?
Once is fine - doing it every single time you want to see a reply to an
email gets extremely annoying (try 500x per day).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
scott <sco### [at] laptopcom> wrote:
> > Awkward? How hard is it to press the "end" key in the keyboard?
> Once is fine - doing it every single time you want to see a reply to an
> email gets extremely annoying (try 500x per day).
I really can't see any problem.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Once is fine - doing it every single time you want to see a reply to an
>> email gets extremely annoying (try 500x per day).
>
> I really can't see any problem.
I guess fortunately you don't spend a large proportion of your time reading
through emails then...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> But RTS/CTS means more to me :)
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Ah! Now I understand. You're using 802.11 too
John
CTS :-)
--
I will be brief but not nearly so brief as Salvador Dali, who gave the
world's shortest speech. He said, "I will be so brief I am already
finished," then he sat down.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:38:12 +0000, Doctor John <doc### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>>
>> But RTS/CTS means more to me :)
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>Ah! Now I understand. You're using 802.11 too
>
>John
>
>CTS :-)
RxD :)
Sorry RS232 :-)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
