 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:31:04 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>
>> Try "n" to go to the next unread message (IIRC, that's the shortcut in
>> Thunderbird).
>
> N is for Neato... :-D
See, it does pay to learn how to use the tools? ;-) <again, scnr>
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:36:13 -0200, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Jim Henderson escribió:
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:18:24 -0200, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>>> How about doing the right thing and changing the post Subject: field
>>> when the subject actually changes? :)
>>
>> That would be too confusing - it is off-topic, after all, so why should
>> the topic of the post match the subject line? ;-)
>
> Not confusing - it's done all the time on mailing lists.
That's mailing lists, not newsgroups. Some borken readers thread by
subject. But I was meaning in a more esoteric way it's confusing - it's
off-topic, so at least we're consistent in being off-topic in content vs.
subject. It's a kinda "meta" thing. :-)
> http://stuff.povaddict.com.ar/thread-subject-change.png
Yeah, this isn't my first online discussion or e-mail list discussion.
Been doing this for many, many years.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmail isthebestcom> wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 escribió:
> > Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >> I use gvim, a bash shell, and gcc for all my development needs.
> >
> > M'ok, fair enough...
> >
> >> And I'm on *Windows*...
> >
> > WAH! O__O
>
> Well, I use Eclipse for Java. But that's the only exception. I use
> vim+bash+gcc (MinGW) for C(++). And vim too for PHP, JS, whatever.
yep, that's a pretty good setup. I only need Emacs when messing around with
Scheme programming. Emacs is made of and for Lisp code...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
>
> True, but they can't know for sure. But IME most technicians at software
> vendors don't have time to spend digging through core files to see what
> confidential data is being leaked. Then again, most of those who do core
> file analysis where I work are highly trusted professionals as well.
I was meaning the boss with "don't send it, it may inhold secret
information" -thoughts.
> Jim
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>>
>> If you miss a hit on a keyboard, it writes wrong letter...
>
> Yeah, but you know what? The keys are all seperate. ;-)
I have to admit, that's true. Doesn't force you to miss a hit with a
touchpad, though :p.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v7 wrote:
>
> IIRC, Xconfigurator never worked properly, and I always had to use vim
> to edit the X11 config, wait the the filesystem to sync, and then reboot
> the PC to exit vim... :-S
>
It did for me, for several GFX-cards.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:41:58 +0200, Eero Ahonen wrote:
>> True, but they can't know for sure. But IME most technicians at
>> software vendors don't have time to spend digging through core files to
>> see what confidential data is being leaked. Then again, most of those
>> who do core file analysis where I work are highly trusted professionals
>> as well.
>
> I was meaning the boss with "don't send it, it may inhold secret
> information" -thoughts.
Well, yes, and I know we see that from time to time - the banking
industry, for example, or the health care industry. That's why in
situations like that, reproducing the problem on a machine that doesn't
house that data is used instead of the actual machine that's crashing.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Well, the whole point of Macs is that you don't have to know how
> it works. No wonder salesmen don't either. ;)
Very droll, very droll. :-)
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Henderson wrote:
> The Matrox cards ISTR were fairly fussy about configuration. I think I
> owned one once and swore I'd never go back.
Last time I had one, they supported it by releasing new drivers for new
OSes long after they stopped selling the card. I liked that at least.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
On what day did God create the body thetans?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:39:20 -0800, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> The Matrox cards ISTR were fairly fussy about configuration. I think I
>> owned one once and swore I'd never go back.
>
> Last time I had one, they supported it by releasing new drivers for new
> OSes long after they stopped selling the card. I liked that at least.
That was a cool feature.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
