Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who 
actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of 
MS's free versions of their dev tools.

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who 
> actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of 
> MS's free versions of their dev tools.

about as shitty as their commercial offerings, only even more limited 
and buggy. ;)

Post a reply to this message

nemesis wrote:

> about as shitty as their commercial offerings, only even more limited 
> and buggy. ;)

Limited? yes. But, not terribly so. Buggy? Less so than prior versions.

Has some nice features. I sort of got forced into writing something for 
VC# express because a library supplied by a vendor was using generics, 
and we're still using ancient VS.NET. (Which is quite bug-ridden)

Their license is quite nice, the ability to just use it without having 
to keep myself within the realm of "personal use only" is very nice.

Post a reply to this message

> Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who 
> actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of 
> MS's free versions of their dev tools.

I once tried it. Couldn't do anything useful with it during a whole 
hour. I uninstalled it. Of course, despite recommendations made by 
Microsoft itself to other developers, the uninstaller didn't remove 
everything that was installed. I was months with lots of filetypes (like 
.c) still associated to VS express.

I use gvim and a bash shell (yes, in Windows) for all my development 
needs. Except for POV-Ray, where I use the internal editor, and for 
Java, where I use Eclipse. MinGW as C compiler.

Post a reply to this message

> Has some nice features. I sort of got forced into writing something for 
> VC# express because a library supplied by a vendor was using generics, 
> and we're still using ancient VS.NET. (Which is quite bug-ridden)

Ah, .not. I stay away from that. Even though some things look tempting. 
But hey, Vista screenshots with Aero are tempting too (that's the whole 
idea of marketing), and no way in hell I'll downgrade to it.

Post a reply to this message

"Mike Raiford" <mra### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:47a0c3a7$1@news.povray.org...
> Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who
> actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of
> MS's free versions of their dev tools.

I've used SQL Express, VS Express C# and web. They're fine for small
development projects. I wouldn't use them in a massive team on a large
commercial project, but for playing around or for smaller things, they're
fine.

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who 
> actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of 
> MS's free versions of their dev tools.

I installed VS C++ 2005, and immediately found that I could not set it 
to assume that all strings were ASCII strings; I had to specifically 
call the API function that is decorated with 'A' to specify that; 
Bloodshed and OpenWatcom allow you to specify the string type with one 
compiler setting, and the compiler automagically decorates them for you.

After editing all of the sources to put in what the compiler will not 
let me assume, it then failed to recognize another API call during the 
link phase.

I already have two C++ compilers that work just fine (Bloodshed and 
OpenWatcom), so getting MS to work is just too much trouble.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message

Mike Raiford wrote:
> Anybody played with them. I realize there are relatively few on here who 
> actually like MS products, but I want to hear other peoples opinions of 
> MS's free versions of their dev tools.

I used to like it, until I had a chance to see the professional version 
in action.  For whatever reason, the free version is crippled beyond 
belief, speed-wise.  It would literally take more than ten times as long 
to open, load projects, or compile them.  The output would be identical, 
though, so if you're OK with the wait, go for it.

-- 
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message

Gail Shaw wrote:
> I've used SQL Express, VS Express C# and web. They're fine for small
> development projects. I wouldn't use them in a massive team on a large
> commercial project, but for playing around or for smaller things, they're
> fine.

What she said.  If it's a one-person project, it's sufficient.  Once you 
start wanting source code control, automatic testing, etc., you'll want 
the for-fee version. (Which, really, isn't that expensive. If your 
employer can't afford a half-day of your pay to get you the tools you 
need, you should be shopping your resume around.)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     On what day did God create the body thetans?

Post a reply to this message

John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I installed VS C++ 2005, and immediately found that I could not set it 
> to assume that all strings were ASCII strings

  Really? There's a setting in the project properties for this.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message