You guys (and gals) should be a MoMA (Message 1 to 3 of 3)
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: You guys (and gals) should be a MoMA
Date: 2 Dec 2007 21:50:42
Message: <47536f02@news.povray.org>
I went to MOMA today. Pretty cool. So many times I said, "I could do
that."
I had seen 3D animation there before in terms of an architectural rendering
in the Architecture wing. Today for the first time I saw an actual 3D
animation for animation's sake: something that was like bubbles in blue
oil. I bet 1/3 of you could do something as nice with a weeks' work.
I wonder how you get in?
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: You guys (and gals) should be *at* MoMA
Date: 2 Dec 2007 21:55:16
Message: <47537014@news.povray.org>
Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> I went to MOMA today. Pretty cool. So many times I said, "I could do> that."> > I had seen 3D animation there before in terms of an architectural> rendering> in the Architecture wing. Today for the first time I saw an actual 3D> animation for animation's sake: something that was like bubbles in blue> oil. I bet 1/3 of you could do something as nice with a weeks' work.> > I wonder how you get in?
From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: You guys (and gals) should be a MoMA
Date: 3 Dec 2007 19:42:31
Message: <4754a277@news.povray.org>
Greg M. Johnson wrote:
> I went to MOMA today. Pretty cool. So many times I said, "I could do> that." > > I had seen 3D animation there before in terms of an architectural rendering> in the Architecture wing. Today for the first time I saw an actual 3D> animation for animation's sake: something that was like bubbles in blue> oil. I bet 1/3 of you could do something as nice with a weeks' work. > > I wonder how you get in?
Have the proper connections, just like any other endeavor where the
ability to quantify the desired characteristic does not yet exist.
Regards,
John
