Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:08:05 -0700, Kevin Wampler wrote:
>
> > I love opera, and I still have to agree with this.  I think some operas
> > probably lend themselves a bit more to good (or less-bad) acting than
> > others though.
>
> Agreed. :-)
>
> They also tend to require the use of a fair bit of imagination; I like
> Wagner's Ring cycle, but the versions I've seen performed it was clear,
> for example, that Fafner was just a few people manipulating a big puppet.
>
> It would be cool, I think, if someone adapted some of the classic operas
> to film format - there are some pretty good (and some pretty awful)
> stories.
>
> Jim

The Met recorded their "Time Tunnel" Ring cycle version about 10 years ago. It
is probably still available.

Like in the theatre you need to suspend disbelief. Sometimes that is a bit hard
if you keep your eyes open. :)
For me it is the music + voices that are important.

Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:47:44 -0500, Stephen wrote:

> The Met recorded their "Time Tunnel" Ring cycle version about 10 years
> ago. It is probably still available.

I believe that's the one I have.  I'm thinking more of a re-dramatization 
of the series, perhaps taking the story and retelling it in a more 
cinematic style using a rescoring of the original music to fit.

> Like in the theatre you need to suspend disbelief. Sometimes that is a
> bit hard if you keep your eyes open.

Yes; I went and saw Carmina Burana performed by Ballet West here in SLC - 
given the origins of the music, setting dance to it was something I 
thought would be a bit odd, but strangely it worked.  Pity the 
performance of the music wasn't up to my standard.

> For me it is the music + voices that are important.

Oh, yes, absolutely.

Jim

Post a reply to this message

Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:47:44 -0500, Stephen wrote:
>
> > The Met recorded their "Time Tunnel" Ring cycle version about 10 years
> > ago. It is probably still available.
>
> I believe that's the one I have.  I'm thinking more of a re-dramatization
> of the series, perhaps taking the story and retelling it in a more
> cinematic style using a rescoring of the original music to fit.

Sorry for the delay in replying. You might be opening a can of worms with the

are talking about Wagner watch out. About 10 years ago Willard White was


English as well :)

of any opera that is in the cannon that would transfer well to the modern
cinema. Except Billy Budd set in the era of Starship troupers. But then it is
modern and by the only modern composer that I can listen to. Plink! Plink!
Screech! Screech! :)


> > Like in the theatre you need to suspend disbelief. Sometimes that is a
> > bit hard if you keep your eyes open.
>
> Yes; I went and saw Carmina Burana performed by Ballet West here in SLC -
> given the origins of the music, setting dance to it was something I
> thought would be a bit odd, but strangely it worked.  Pity the
> performance of the music wasn't up to my standard.
>


Carmina Burana being produced there ????
Shame about the standard, come to London:)

> > For me it is the music + voices that are important.
>
> Oh, yes, absolutely.
>
> Jim

One of the complaints about opera in English is that it is hard to get the
translation to scan and keep the original sense. So I prefer to listen in the
original language and follow the libretto until I know the opera.


view. If you want to continue you could always mail me.



Stephen

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Sat, 03 Nov 2007 03:29:15 -0000, nemesis  
<nam### [at] gmailcom> did spake, saying:

> Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>> "Bad acting, but good singing."
>>
>>   I think that quite aptly describes opera. :P
>
> never really digged Opera, except for a few arias and orchestral  
> passages.  I
> feel very much the same as when watching some of the old Hollywood  
> musicals:
> actors suddenly stopping what they are doing and beggining to sing and  
> dance
> out of nowhere give me the creeps... it's out of context but are very  
> enjoyable
> out of the context of the work itself... :)

Agreed, for me it's not just the sudden bursting into song, it's the way  
everyone joins in then forgets all about it once the song has finished.  
The only musicals I can stand are Bugsy Malone, Little Shop of Horrors,  
and The Rocky Horror Picture Show; others and opera make me wince.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

Hmm, I though "The coolest, fastest, and most secure free Web browser available" was a
more apt description.

Post a reply to this message

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:37:03 -0500, Stephen wrote:

> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 11:47:44 -0500, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> > The Met recorded their "Time Tunnel" Ring cycle version about 10
>> > years ago. It is probably still available.
>>
>> I believe that's the one I have.  I'm thinking more of a
>> re-dramatization of the series, perhaps taking the story and retelling
>> it in a more cinematic style using a rescoring of the original music to
>> fit.
> 
> Sorry for the delay in replying. You might be opening a can of worms
> with the purists, re-scoring the music. Not that it hasn’t been done
> before. But if you are talking about Wagner watch out. About 10 years
> ago Willard White was singing Wotan in the Scottish Opera’s production
> of Siegfried. There were protests outside the theatre because Wotan “was
> not Black”. Thank God he wasn’t English as well :)
> Actually I have a problem with your suggestion. I don’t thing that I can
> think of any opera that is in the cannon that would transfer well to the
> modern cinema. Except Billy Budd set in the era of Starship troupers.
> But then it is modern and by the only modern composer that I can listen
> to. Plink! Plink! Screech! Screech! :)

Well, yeah, but there are always going to be people who think "it wasn't 
done right".  Doing the entire Ring even in 3 movies would be difficult 
at best.

>> > Like in the theatre you need to suspend disbelief. Sometimes that is
>> > a bit hard if you keep your eyes open.
>>
>> Yes; I went and saw Carmina Burana performed by Ballet West here in SLC
>> - given the origins of the music, setting dance to it was something I
>> thought would be a bit odd, but strangely it worked.  Pity the
>> performance of the music wasn't up to my standard.
>>
>>
> Oh! I can imagine that, on second thoughts “SLC” I find it hard to
> imagine Carmina Burana being produced there ???? Shame about the
> standard, come to London:)

I'd love to do that.  And if you think Carmina being performed in SLC 
(which is actually fairly left of center compared to the rest of the 
state), you should hear KBYU (the radio station at Brigham Young 
University) broadcast Berlioz's Symphonie Fantastique.  Now *there's* 
irony for you. ;-)

> One of the complaints about opera in English is that it is hard to get
> the translation to scan and keep the original sense. So I prefer to
> listen in the original language and follow the libretto until I know the
> opera.

Same here.  Did that with Carmina as well, for that matter.  It can be 
difficult, but the story itself, I think, could be translated 
effectively.  I'd love to see the Immolation scene at the end of 
Gotterdammrung done in a cinematic style - now *that* would be cool.

> I should not have joined in an OT thread as I can’t keep up with it on
> the web view. If you want to continue you could always mail me.

:-(  I prefer the group myself, why not a newsreader for you? ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message