|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mueen Nawaz" <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote in message
news:471eca83$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Huge.
>
> The images, not the spider.
>
Yeah, I left them in ultra huge size, just because I'm lazy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Brian Elliott" <NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> wrote in message
news:471f2b7f@news.povray.org...
>
> "Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> wrote in message
> news:471e0791$1@news.povray.org...
>> Ok, to those of you living in more diverse regions of the planet, this
>> may
>> not be as interesting. But, it's probably the largest type of spider
>> that
>> I've seen here in Michigan, so I took a few pictures. That "thing" all
>> wadded up is a medium sized grasshopper, probably about an inch long.
>>
>> http://www.beantoad.com/newimages/img_0143.jpg
>
> Michigan eh? That is remarkably similar to the St. Andrew's Cross spider
> here in Australia (Brisbane, mid-East coast)
>
> Here's a couple of examples I took in my friend's front garden in June
> 2005.
> Front and back views of the same spider.
>
> Also we have what we call "Garden Spiders", "Golden Orb Spiders" (very
> strong, very golden thread) and "Tent Spiders". The latter produce a big
> upside-down parabolic tightly-wound web, connected to the surroundings by
> a
> big messy tangle of guy-wires.
>
Yeah, a fellow at work said he thought it was a golden orb, but I haven't
been able to find any pictures on the Web that look exactly like it. The
Golden Garden Spider seemed to be pretty close, but not an exact match.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Raiford wrote:
> scott wrote:
>
>>
>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/81/212608329_1ddb12ac0f_o.jpg
>>
>> The body was about 1cm long, but it's legs were probably 10cm each
>> making it look huge and scary.
>>
>
> Harvestman, or Daddy Long Legs, depending on your vernacular. very
> harmless. Technically not a spider.
In the UK at least, harvestmen are very skinny spiders with small round
bodies about 0.5cm across and long hairlike legs. Daddylonglegs are a
type of fly reminiscent of a large mosquito but with a very skinny body
and stupidly oversized legs just like harvest-spider. Both are
completely harmless.
Scott's photo definitely shows an arachnid of some kind if those are all
legs.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>> http://farm1.static.flickr.com/81/212608329_1ddb12ac0f_o.jpg
>>>
>>> The body was about 1cm long, but it's legs were probably 10cm each
>>> making it look huge and scary.
>>>
>>
>> Harvestman, or Daddy Long Legs, depending on your vernacular. very
>> harmless. Technically not a spider.
>
> In the UK at least, harvestmen are very skinny spiders with small round
> bodies about 0.5cm across and long hairlike legs. Daddylonglegs are a type
> of fly reminiscent of a large mosquito but with a very skinny body and
> stupidly oversized legs just like harvest-spider. Both are completely
> harmless.
>
> Scott's photo definitely shows an arachnid of some kind if those are all
> legs.
Yeh, they were all legs. The body was the size of your little finger nail,
and all the legs spread out so it was about the size of an out-stretched
hand. It just seemed amazing to me how the legs would work being that long
and that thin, especially as (IIRC) they had 1 or 2 joints in them too.
I did have a photo of the whole thing somewhere but I can't find it right
now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> In the UK at least, harvestmen are very skinny spiders with small round
> bodies about 0.5cm across and long hairlike legs.
FWIW, at least in the parts of the US I ever frequented, we called what
you describe there a daddy longlegs.
> completely harmless.
And just as a hint, never squish them in an enclosed space. We had a
bunch in a tent in the rain, and mushed maybe three before we wound up
sitting outside in the rain for an hour letting it air out.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |