 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nifty! (and more than fit for public viewing)
It works quite well as is AND could serve as the basis for a variety of
interesting expansions and variations. Congrats.
Regards,
Mike C.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks! I have to admit I was thinking of doing lots of animations all
starting/ending with the same sphere then mixing/matching them into a clip
of some kind. Failing hat, maybe turning it into a convenient colour chart -
If only I could get ti to render in realtime...
> Nifty! (and more than fit for public viewing)
> It works quite well as is AND could serve as the basis for a variety of
> interesting expansions and variations. Congrats.
> Regards,
> Mike C.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> Well, this is the first animation I've made that I deem fit for public
> viewing - entirely abstract, very simple and its obvious I'm new to this, so
> go gently... (and ok, it's not just a simple white sphere)
It's a heck of a lot nicer than any animation I've ever made. :-)
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when a co-worker nearly kills
himself over losing an hour's worth of work after a computer crash, and
you just calmly shrug your shoulders and say, "Is that all?"
Taps a.k.a. Tapio Vocadlo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Simon" <povray@NOSPAM|SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Both videos are XVid encoded (2-Pass), so should be fairly playable on most
> platforms.
Can't see the XVid, sorry...
> (Incidentally, I'm using FadeToBlack for this - stitching the
> images/encoding - if anyone knows of a better one for Windows, please let me
> know - I've only got 18 trial days left...)
A free alternative is Virtual Dub -- pretty bare bones, but it'll slap your
images together in an AVI. For fancy editing, you're gonna have to shell
out a few bucks :/
--
Dan
GoofyGraffix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Dan,
Can I ask what OS/Player you're using? Just curious as I was under the
(mistaken?) mimpression that XVid was fairly universal nowadays... Whenever
I have tme, I'm going to Flash encode them (the way youTube do) then publish
them that way - EVERYONE can get flash and it's actually a little easier oin
bandwidth
> Can't see the XVid, sorry...
>
> A free alternative is Virtual Dub -- pretty bare bones, but it'll slap
> your
> images together in an AVI. For fancy editing, you're gonna have to shell
> out a few bucks :/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Simon" <povray@NOSPAM|SOWare.co.uk> wrote:
> Both videos are XVid encoded (2-Pass), so should be fairly playable on most
> platforms. (Incidentally, I'm using FadeToBlack for this - stitching the
> images/encoding - if anyone knows of a better one for Windows, please let me
> know - I've only got 18 trial days left...)
I use TMPEGenc which I like. If you want to encode png files you will need
to download an extra plugin.
http://www.tmpgenc.net/
A very nice first animation BTW.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Can I ask what OS/Player you're using? Just curious as I was under the
> (mistaken?) mimpression that XVid was fairly universal nowadays... Whenever
> I have tme, I'm going to Flash encode them (the way youTube do) then publish
> them that way - EVERYONE can get flash and it's actually a little easier oin
> bandwidth
Actually no. There's still _no_ 64-bit flash player for Linux available.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And the 32-bit version won't run in a 64-bit environment? I have to admit my
Linux knowledge is rusty so could be completely wrong but I was under the
impression that processes could be started in a 32-bit emulation mode?
> Actually no. There's still _no_ 64-bit flash player for Linux available.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simon wrote:
> And the 32-bit version won't run in a 64-bit environment? I have to admit my
> Linux knowledge is rusty so could be completely wrong but I was under the
> impression that processes could be started in a 32-bit emulation mode?
The 32-bit version runs fine *if* you have a 32-bit browser (running
under 32-bit emulation mode, of course). It doesn't work with 64-bit
browsers.
Now, the *real* issue is that there's no Flash for Linux/PPC,
Linux/Sparc, or Linux/anything-other-than-Intel-compatible-chips.
Install Linux on a pre-Intel Mac? No Flash for you.
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when your personal
correspondence to friends starts out with #Dear Linda =
Ken Tyler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 05/12/07 12:20, William Tracy nous fit lire :
> Simon wrote:
>> And the 32-bit version won't run in a 64-bit environment? I have to
>> admit my
>> Linux knowledge is rusty so could be completely wrong but I was under the
>> impression that processes could be started in a 32-bit emulation mode?
>
> The 32-bit version runs fine *if* you have a 32-bit browser (running
> under 32-bit emulation mode, of course). It doesn't work with 64-bit
> browsers.
Well, it can, if you have a 64/32 bit processors (like AMD), and a
wrapper for your browser to use 32 bits-plugins in 64 bit browser...
and time and knowledge to set this kind of environment. It's not
obvious.
No luke for Intel true 64 bits! Top of the line Itanium... well, no
flash!
>
> Now, the *real* issue is that there's no Flash for Linux/PPC,
> Linux/Sparc, or Linux/anything-other-than-Intel-compatible-chips.
>
Right! No flash if your not on a x86 compatible...
> Install Linux on a pre-Intel Mac? No Flash for you.
Right again!
Please stay away from closed-source encoding.
--
The superior man understands what is right;
the inferior man understands what will sell.
-- Confucius
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
