POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.newusers : Warning question Server Time
12 Nov 2024 19:18:51 EST (-0500)
  Warning question (Message 1 to 6 of 6)  
From: Hershel Robinson
Subject: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 07:05:37
Message: <3bcac301@news.povray.org>
Why does the following code generate a:
Warning: Unnecessary bounding object removed.
for each tile in the road?  (POV-Ray 3.5 beta 6)

Thanks,
Hershel

Code:

#declare TileSize = 8;
#declare I = -30;
#declare Road =
union {
   #while (I<=400)
      #declare J = -50;
      #while (J<=50)
         plane { y, -20
            bounded_by { box { <J,-30,I>, <J+TileSize,0,I+TileSize> } }
            clipped_by { bounded_by }
         }
         plane { y, -20
            bounded_by { box { <J+TileSize,-30,I+TileSize>,
<J+TileSize*2,0,I+TileSize*2> } }
            clipped_by { bounded_by }
         }
         #declare J=J+TileSize*2;
      #end
      #declare I=I+TileSize*2;
   #end
   texture {
      pigment {
         granite
         scale <0.3, 1, 0.3>
         colour_map {
            [0 1 colour Black
                 colour red 0.5 green 0.5 blue 0.5]
         }
      }
      finish {
         specular 1
         roughness 0.02
         reflection 0.25
      }
   } // texture
   no_shadow
}


Post a reply to this message

From: Micha Riser
Subject: Re: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 15:25:47
Message: <3bcb383b$1@news.povray.org>
Hershel Robinson wrote:

> Why does the following code generate a:
> Warning: Unnecessary bounding object removed.
> for each tile in the road?  (POV-Ray 3.5 beta 6)
> 
It seems that it would render faster without the manual bounding. If you do 
not want that povray removes your bounding object, then use the '-UR' 
switch. This will also remove the warnings.

- Micha


Post a reply to this message

From: JRG
Subject: Re: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 15:28:46
Message: <3bcb38ee@news.povray.org>
Why are you using clipped planes instead of simpler boxes?

--
Jonathan.


Post a reply to this message

From: Hershel Robinson
Subject: Re: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 16:23:17
Message: <3bcb45b5@news.povray.org>
> It seems that it would render faster without the manual bounding. If you
do
> not want that povray removes your bounding object, then use the '-UR'
> switch. This will also remove the warnings.

You are correct--55 seconds with bounding and 41 without bounding, i.e. I
removed the bounded_by statements myself.  Do you know why it's faster
without them?

>Why are you using clipped planes instead of simpler boxes?

Well, this 'road' used to be a tiled floor in a room.  As the scene
progressed, I removed the walls and wanted to make half the tiles clear.
The clipped planes was just the first idea which came to mind--it's sort of
the evolution of the floor-plane.

Thanks for responding,
Hershel


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Williams
Subject: Re: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 17:06:05
Message: <PRFYpAAbDzy7EwU7@econym.demon.co.uk>
Wasn't it Hershel Robinson who wrote:
>Why does the following code generate a:
>Warning: Unnecessary bounding object removed.
>for each tile in the road?  (POV-Ray 3.5 beta 6)
>
>Thanks,
>Hershel

Because the bounded_by's are unnecessary. The scene renders faster if
you replace

            bounded_by { box { <J,-30,I>, <J+TileSize,0,I+TileSize> } }
            clipped_by { bounded_by }

by
            clipped_by { box { <J,-30,I>, <J+TileSize,0,I+TileSize> } }


and replace

            bounded_by { box { <J+TileSize,-30,I+TileSize>,
<J+TileSize*2,0,I+TileSize*2> } }
            clipped_by { bounded_by }

by

            clipped_by { box { <J+TileSize,-30,I+TileSize>,
<J+TileSize*2,0,I+TileSize*2> } }

I.e. get rid of the bounds and just clip.

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure


Post a reply to this message

From: Micha Riser
Subject: Re: Warning question
Date: 15 Oct 2001 17:55:37
Message: <3bcb5b59@news.povray.org>
Hershel Robinson wrote:

>> It seems that it would render faster without the manual bounding. If you
> do
>> not want that povray removes your bounding object, then use the '-UR'
>> switch. This will also remove the warnings.
> 
> You are correct--55 seconds with bounding and 41 without bounding, i.e. I
> removed the bounded_by statements myself.  Do you know why it's faster
> without them?
> 

POV-Ray does bound the object itself and often it does it quite well. Your 
bounding has not been good as you bounded every plane itself. The warning 
pov has given was because with that kind of CSG you were using the 
automatic bounding is generally better than manual bounding. This has not 
to be true in every case though.

- Micha


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.